What's New for 1968

Run to Rund · 04-15-2012, 12:09 PM

Unfortunately, F.A.S.T.only appears stock, and the cars have radical modifications, as discused in Dec. 2010 Muscle Car Review. Huge engines, gutted interiors, etc. These days it is very tough to get good comparisons of how things were "back in the day." Even tests back then were flawed by testers using stopwatches, good vs. bad drivers, "ringer" cars like the infamous 1964 GTO that had a 421, and the antics reported in March 1966 Car & Driver where Holman & Moody and Bud Moore prepped the Ford and Mercury respectively, the GTO was a Royal "Bobcat" but the 442, etc. appeared to be bone stock.

04-15-2012, 12:09 PM	#11
Run to Rund Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Henderson, NV Posts: 585 Likes: 9 Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts	Re: What's New for 1968 Unfortunately, F.A.S.T.only appears stock, and the cars have radical modifications, as discused in Dec. 2010 Muscle Car Review. Huge engines, gutted interiors, etc. These days it is very tough to get good comparisons of how things were "back in the day." Even tests back then were flawed by testers using stopwatches, good vs. bad drivers, "ringer" cars like the infamous 1964 GTO that had a 421, and the antics reported in March 1966 Car & Driver where Holman & Moody and Bud Moore prepped the Ford and Mercury respectively, the GTO was a Royal "Bobcat" but the 442, etc. appeared to be bone stock.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode