|
|
|
|
05-04-2012, 07:36 PM
|
#1 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2012, 07:45 PM
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2012, 09:22 PM
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 68
Liked 87 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
Why would you do that much work and then put the "HEMI" emblem in the wrong place?
|
|
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 12:52 AM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
Moose,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Yes,,,,,,,,,,,,,I'm sure a few 'Factory-Back-Door-Sneaker-Outers' found their way to some 'special racers'....... Maybe some 'police interceptors',,,,,,,,,,Belvedere and Coronets with a 440/375 HP 'Super Commando',,,,,, Fleet Order Only cars,,,,,,,,,, On the 426 HEMI, never saw a 1968 Belvedere or Satellite with the 'Street Hemi', I'm pretty sure that engine was 'only' reserved for the Road Runner and/or GTX. Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 05-05-2012 at 04:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
hemi badge placement is correct for that model--dave
|
|
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 11:52 AM
|
#6 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 68
Liked 87 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
Quote:
Proof the memory is the first thing to go. Last edited by Charlie A; 05-06-2012 at 11:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-06-2012, 04:20 AM
|
#7 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: What's New for 1968
1968 Dodge Dart GTS
* 340/275 HP * 383/300 HP The NHRA re-rated the 340/275 HP to (315 Horsepower), putting the car in E/Stock for 1968 (10.00 to 10.49 Wt/Hp). The 383/300 HP Dart GTS was classed in F/Stock for 1968. A restrictive exhaust system, was the reason for the lower 300 HP rating. A 340/275 HP,,, w/Automatic Transmission and 3.55 Gears,,,,,,,,,,14.70 @ 96 MPH A 383/300 HP,,,w/Automatic Transmission and 3.55 Gears,,,,,,,,,,,15.00 @ 94 MPH 
Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 05-06-2012 at 10:30 PM. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
