HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-31-2012, 01:48 PM   #9
JRyan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

I whole-heartedly agree with Carl & Reed that the two grams makes virtually no differnece. In fact, knats-*** balancing is highly overrated. For instance, you're in a circle track car turning left, do you balance the right side lighter than the left due to oil being thrown onto the right bank? Do you balance the rear lighter than the front due to loading the rear on acceleration? What about when you hit the brakes. In a
Formula 1 dry-sump world, pan efficiency might correct some of those issues, but in our world, we can only guess. Does your balance guy use one, two, or three percent overbalance? Does he really know what's correct 'cause the bearings might look good in all three cases?

Grumpy Jenkins used to put 70 gram heavier wrist pins in the race engines and put them on the dyno. When it came time to go racing, he put the light ones back in. If 70 grams per rod end weight didn't cause problems for the Grump, four grams per journal certainly won't. Don't worry about it.

Jerry
JRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.