HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2012, 12:50 PM   #1
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I've never done this exact scenario, but, say, stock cam diameter, stock lifter diameter, .700 lift at the valve roller. No vac pumps, or external oil pumps. Cast intake only. No external mods to intake, brodix spec only, polish combustion chamber, and milling only. Intake, and exhaust ports remain factory specs. They have the word spec cast into both exhaust and intake, and flow virtually the same all 3 manufactorers. Ford has a little better no. on the exhaust, but not enough to get too excited about. Just my ideas guys, not cut in stone. I know it works for the roundy-rounders.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 01:59 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I ran a '69 Camaro in C/SM the first year they had the class. Read and re-read Rick Voglin's Car Craft articles about building his car. First year there was just the one class, which became B/SMif I remember correctly. Never had a problem running under the index. had heads from RHS to begin with then a set from MI (forget the shop's name) then a killer set from Lee Shephard. The other two sets ran the same, but Lee's heads flowed more and were faster. Had a 292", 305", and 317". Never could get the car light enough for the 292", but it was still the fastest.

I seldon had a problem hooking on 10.5" Firestones, but they started to go away after about 15 passes. Usually left, depending on the track, between 8000 & 9500.

It was a fun class. Danny Bird had a fast one.

Those rules were fine, imho. I never knew of anybody "cheating" the heads. Like building an SS car with lumps on the pistons. Some guys were trying to run them like a Modified car, trying to spin them too high. Made that mistake myself for a while. I think the heads would be tougher to police now.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

Last edited by Ed Wright; 08-16-2012 at 02:13 PM.
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 02:21 PM   #3
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I agree Ed, but if a sanctioned body would put the head policing in the manufacturers hand, it would save time and money. There is a way, but I don't pretend to have all the answers. The heads are so close to equal, I don't know why we couldn'tt at least give them a look. I think I owned Danny Byrd's camaro, a 67 I purchased from Linden Bodnard from Canada in 86 I believe. I ran it in SS|CS and later in C\EM.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 02:50 PM   #4
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

One class is all thats needed. One sealed Circle track 400 hp Chevy motor. Only one trans. Pg or stick. ANY Stk or SS or Comp door car chassis at same lb per cubic inch. One carb 750. WOuld S/g car qualify for that chassis?with ballast? Build it yourself motor could be another variation class but cost would be problem.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 03:01 PM   #5
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,605 Times in 583 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
One class is all thats needed. One sealed Circle track 400 hp Chevy motor. Only one trans. Pg or stick. ANY Stk or SS or Comp door car chassis at same lb per cubic inch. One carb 750. WOuld S/g car qualify for that chassis?with ballast? Build it yourself motor could be another variation class but cost would be problem.
Dick, it always appears that in your world the only product or make to race is a Chevy!!!
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 03:23 PM   #6
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

One thing for all to remember is, if we don't turn enough r's, and pull the wheels, and have a lot of clutch and gear action, it will not fly. Also, you need all 3 makes involved. That's why I like the brodix spec head. They did all the homework for us.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:40 AM   #7
mloboda
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: cleveland Ohio
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy wilson View Post
One thing for all to remember is, if we don't turn enough r's, and pull the wheels, and have a lot of clutch and gear action, it will not fly. Also, you need all 3 makes involved. That's why I like the brodix spec head. They did all the homework for us.
Dead on. If the car is not a stick, no one is interested in watching.
mloboda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 03:28 PM   #8
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Talking Re: Bring back super/mod...

To cut legacy costs

Use commercially sold car fuel
such as
PUMP GASOLINE !!!
or
E85 since it is a new Commercial Product.

Limit cam lift to .550 to reduce Valve Trane breakage.
Would consider Aluminum Heads.
Rule limit CC and Valve Diameter.
Intake Manifold with a limit of 2 Inch Hood rise.
EFI Throttle Body
Limit to Iron Blocks
Common Engine Sizes like 355, 396 and 430
9 inch Stocker Slick
Stock Fuel Tanks
Full Interiors

Super Boom Box Stereos :-)

Would like to see a Fat Body Class for Ford LTD/CV's, Bonneville, Wildcats, Impalas, Dodges/Plymouth, Rebel AMC's included.



D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 03:30 PM   #9
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Who are we kidding? None of this will ever happen anyway.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 08:07 AM   #10
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
To cut legacy costs

Use commercially sold car fuel
such as
PUMP GASOLINE !!!
or
E85 since it is a new Commercial Product.

Limit cam lift to .550 to reduce Valve Trane breakage.
Would consider Aluminum Heads.
Rule limit CC and Valve Diameter.
Intake Manifold with a limit of 2 Inch Hood rise.
EFI Throttle Body
Limit to Iron Blocks
Common Engine Sizes like 355, 396 and 430
9 inch Stocker Slick
Stock Fuel Tanks
Full Interiors

Super Boom Box Stereos :-)

Would like to see a Fat Body Class for Ford LTD/CV's, Bonneville, Wildcats, Impalas, Dodges/Plymouth, Rebel AMC's included.



D
I can't imagine any one of those working. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.