|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Make the claim a realistic $10,000, without the carb and pan, and you got a deal. Everyone knows everyone has a carb they wouldn't trade to get their wife back, and the pan may only fit a certain chassis. Also, I think just trading heads would be the cure, with just a $500 trade. What say you all?
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
How do you prevent a couple or three guys from trading killer heads amongst themselves, or passing around a ringer of an engine? I know claimer rules exist in roundy rounders, just curious how they prevent such a phenomenon? What problems did you have that made you decide to close the track down?
__________________
IHRA STK 932 O/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
If anyone, I mean anyone, at any time, can claim your heads with identical exchange, that would stop the ringer deal. I closed the track mainly because I didn't have the time I truly needed to put into it. The constant bitching from people I knew well was just the final straw. That would not be a problem in sanctioned racing. We were accused of favoring our car, when the rules were exactly the same for all. It takes a lot more time to run a track then people think.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Whitecourt,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 236
Likes: 4,665
Liked 91 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
I would be totally into this. I think a $500 claimer rule on heads would help help level the playing field. Would the old clutch assisted Nash 5spds be allowed like the old modified days. This new class would help pull out a lot old outclassed modified and superstock cars from the back corners of shops and bracket classes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I like the idea of any clutch assisted 5 speed. Doug Nash included. I did a back to back with a Nash and a faceplate G-Force, .001 difference in the Nash's favor. That's just driver variance. But we were clutching every gear, literally. To make sure people are using the clutch, we had a roll bar mounted camera that under a $25 protest, would be put in the car and had to do a back-up run within .002. The 9 in. tire deal won't work because most cars have tubs that are sitting. I like a spec 11.5 tire myself. But we all will never agree on all points. I definetely think no computers, or multi disc clutches.Pro tree only. With clutching and driver ability coming back into the race. Pro tree equals less redlights by far.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Right on up the ladder, next slowest gets second option
__________________
Tod Lane Swartz & Lane 66 Nova Swartz & Lane 79 H/CM Trans Am |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
When I used to race the dirt tracks, our whole cars were claimers. that could be bought by anyone that attended the race. I am not saying that the whole car should be for sale but letting other people that want to enter the class buy the heads would stop bogus heads
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Randy, Since it would be a start up class with NHRA and people would still want to run NHRA events in a legal form couldnt the specs make the cars legal for one of the Mod SS classes. They wouldnt be class winner but Points meets would still be legal and fun on the dial in end of it. Keep the chassis Legal rules and MAKE the motor combo allowed legal at the wt.? Then if guys support the class in numbers local or points meet races could be added for fun..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,604 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Coast, Massachusetts
Posts: 146
Likes: 160
Liked 50 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
Todays ss/cs engine rules way too liberal as I read whats going on here.. More like a smallblock SS/H Or SS/I car with a smaller cam, say .500 or .550, non- sheetmetal intake, a spec carb, (600-750) etc. I believe a 9.00 weight break at min 3000lbs. (333cu in) would satisfy everybody, the Ford and Chrysler guys included...top out at a maximum of say 3300lbs at 367cu in ...
__________________
Steve Stickel 1161 Stk 1167 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|