HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2012, 08:46 PM   #31
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,832 Times in 415 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster View Post
This is about a car going 1.20 under and on the qualifying sheet , then saying it had the wrong heads and no consequences for the party involved .

My buddy at the race went 1.201 under and got HP and was not torn down .He thinks the timing system could have been off by a thousands or two but he still got hp as did 3 other cars . The 402 should have got HP according to the rules .

I have no axe to grind or no intent to disrespect Brian Tilburg or the driver of the Nova my issiue is with the rule and how it was interpertid at the event .

So now for the record if you dont pass tech 1.20 runs dont count ? what happens if you dont get torn down they count ? so if you make a mistake and dont get caught then its ok ? and if you make a mistake and come clean at tear down you dont get punished for the mistake ?

Thats not how it work for me at the races
So a guy running a legal car should get HP because a guy running a car with the same combination that won't pass tech went fast? That's how it works for you at the races?
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 08:50 PM   #32
boster
Senior Member
 
boster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

No , thats how it works in your world . In my world I get a year off and HP . Wow you really could not bring yourself to say illegal car could you. LMAO
__________________
Bo Kenney

Last edited by boster; 10-16-2012 at 08:53 PM.
boster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 08:59 PM   #33
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,832 Times in 415 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster View Post
No , thats how it works in your world . In my world I get a year off and HP . Wow you really could not bring yourself to say illegal car could you. LMAO
Bo, it is you that claims the 402 Nova should get HP, despite the car not passing tech, it is not me.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 09:12 PM   #34
boster
Senior Member
 
boster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP
__________________
Bo Kenney

Last edited by boster; 10-16-2012 at 09:15 PM.
boster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 09:39 PM   #35
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,832 Times in 415 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster View Post
Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP

So, rather than make things right for everyone, they should make things wrong for everyone. Got it.

Oh, and by the way, there was a Ford that had the wrong valves who only got bounced at Indy a while back, too.

It's entirely possible the cars to be torn down were chosen before qualifying, that's fairly common. You don't have to be fadt to be torn down.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S

Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 10-16-2012 at 09:42 PM.
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 09:41 PM   #36
SS/GSI
Member
 
SS/GSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 292
Likes: 81
Liked 759 Times in 109 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

I don't know the racer in question, and I don't want to seem like I'm just picking on this one racer; however, everyone knows the rules when it comes to drawing attention to themselves when going fast and qualifying at the top of the sheet. You get torndown, you better be legal, for better or for worst. What I don't understand, and PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong, the racer in question goes 1.20 under + , and what doesn't think he's going to the barn at a race notorious for record runs and teardown? On top of that, we have a debatable performance gain or loss issue due to the exhaust valve situation, whatever. So what I want to know is why there was no year suspension for a clear violation of the engine specs. No HP, no repercussions, BO is right, why is it a case by case issue when the rules are black and white. I've seen and heard too many racers get more than this for less. My opinion to this racer, you wanna go fast you better make sure your engine "assembler" keeps you out of trouble or hope for the best. You got lucky.
__________________
Kevin Gaffney
1123 SS/GA
SS/GSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 09:43 PM   #37
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster View Post
Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP
I disagree that the nova should have got horsepower with the wrong heads. But the driver should have been parked for a year.

All 1.20 under runs should get checked before the automatic hp.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 10:04 PM   #38
TILBURG
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 4
Liked 79 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Lets not all get caught up in this 402 deal! Did you guys see that the 262 in a monza got 6hp. Guess we cant go there!lmfao

Last edited by TILBURG; 10-16-2012 at 10:11 PM.
TILBURG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 10:08 PM   #39
Crew Chief
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster View Post
At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?
Probably because it is not mandatory that those that go 1.20 under be torn down. Until it becomes mandatory by the sanctioning body, some will be torn down and some will not.
Crew Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 10:42 PM   #40
BLAZER
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wasthere,England
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted

This is the same old S--T,NHRA class racing will never be the same since nhra and manufactures wanted and allowed BOGUS H/P in--Cheating has been around since--day1--junior johnson built my 2 motor years ago--chevy orange when i brought them in--gray when i picked em up BTW fast in the day!
BLAZER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.