|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 385
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have to agree with Charlie . If I spend a 100k on a car it better qualify in the top 10 anywhere in the country . And for this very reason Im going to by a twin turbo CJ as soon as I can .
Can wait till we have 8.20 stockers and 7.20 super stockers and they are coming to an NHRA track near you.
__________________
Bo Kenney |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 703
Likes: 450
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I think you nailed it.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Zimmerman, MN
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I'm starting to realize why I have no ambition to work on our cars or buy any new parts....
I should be saving my money for a new car so I can compete...
__________________
James & Kari Findell (2) 1973 Plymouth Duster's 340 NHRA Stock Eliminator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Bill "Farmer" Dismuke would have already fixed this.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I looked at some 2012 NHRA results on Drag Race Central and it seems like the classes below CC/S are dominated by older cars in qualifying and eliminations.
Otherwise there is a mixed bag of old & new in the top-10 for overall qualifying and although a few events showed some newer cars in the top 3 in some cases newer cars were well below the top 20. Is it safe to say that 100% of the time no older cars can possibly run .9 to 1.1 under index in any of the classes below CC/S? That would have to be the case if everyone with a 2007 and older car should give up like some are saying. I still don't get how the real complaint is new cars with bogus HP ratings when a LOT of the muscle car era engines that nobody complains about were also underrated. Examples: 427/425. 427/435, and 454/450 Chevys or 427/425 Thunderbolts and 428/335 Cobra Jets. For sure the bigger & badder Chevy's were underrated by 100 or more HP and so was the 1964 Thunderbolt. One thing I'd bet on is the newer factory cars will never go 2 to 4 seconds faster than they did when they were new like the older cars do. I'd also bet the newer car engines won't gain as much HP after tweaking as some of the older combinations do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
They will go faster when it is needed but it will not cost them any money. They will just open the throttle body a little more. They might even need to start opening the secondaries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
The keyboard racers haven't been near the finish line hearing the cars shutting off at 1000', several still running nearly a second under, or setting records, with 2 barrels of their 4 barrel throttle bodies disconnected. Also don't know how fast many have gone when running flat out during private test sessions. They only know what they see on DRC. Therefore do not really know what is going on.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|