|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
|
![]()
that's why if you make the rule that you can only go one tenth faster then your fastest time on the Q sheet even in a head's up race.so at that point a racer would have to show some kind of performance so he don't get burned on a head's up run. that would get rid of the 1000 ft qualifing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
|
![]()
What's not to say that the drivers of the cars that have to race each other heads up make a deal not to race further then the 1000' so that they don't show the performance of the cars. You have to remember that there are factory cars out there now that aren't even close to their potential as far as HP being added to them. So why not make the deal with the other drivers of the same factory cars? They are in a win win situation, race to the 1000' and lift, no one gets HP. Make them race to the 330' not to get HP would work best.
Casey Miles 248H "F" NHRA Stock! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Except my drawers (LOL), after I saw the time slip.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
|
![]()
it is just an idea something to keep this thread going.years ago everybody ran off of the record with a tenth under break out we all know that was only good for two or three cars in the nation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I liked it that way. I won points races a tenth off the record, and was closer to it than anybody else there. Jack Mullins with his big old Pontiac wagon could run under more than often anybody else I knew.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I think you guys are going about this wrong. Instead of penalizing people, calculating 1000-foot times, or setting more rules, a much more diplomatic approach would be to simple give people motivation to keep their foot on the floor all the way to the 1320 be it points for qualifying or points for records. Instead of the NHRA throwing more rules our way, a points bonus substantial enough will slowly force the professional racers and swinging d*cks to put their name at the top of the sheet or in the records books. The advantages of awarding points for qualifications (and maybe records too) far outweigh the day it will take to write the code in the program that calculates points.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 633
Liked 1,987 Times in 599 Posts
|
![]()
You can go to an IHRA race and run as fast as you want. They do not have an AHFS system. some of the NHRA guys run real fast when they are at the IHRA events. I run both so I dont favor either HRA. Just a thought. IHRA sure could use the support too.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
|
![]()
i like that mike in the 80's they gave you extra points for low qualifers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Poor Red and Wesley didn't get to have dinner on time many Saturday evenings. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
2894 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|