|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1,094
Liked 485 Times in 160 Posts
|
![]()
Not sure about high-nickel, but the front area behind timing cover used to to have numbers relating to nickel content in the old prodution blocks as I recall...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Actually I'd be very suprised if GM used 'high nickel' in production blocks. I remember tearing down quite a few sbc's of 60's and 70's vintage out of crashed up cars in yards that had the 010 and 020 numbers in the castings...if that indeed correlated to high nickel content surely the cost to produce would be higher than using iron instead. Some of these blocks/engines were 307's and low performance 350 impalas and chevelles-4 door 2 barrel cars. No need to put expensive castings in those kinds of cars I would think.
__________________
IHRA STK 932 O/SA Last edited by Michael Kilduff; 03-12-2013 at 11:12 PM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 937
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
If I remeber right chevy had a high nickle 4in block in the late 70s early 80s the number was in how to build a small block chevy book in that era I think I still have that book somewhere. My brother ordered one back in the day and never did anything with it. It was over 500$ back then. The 721 chevy II block from 1964 was also supost to be high nickle the 283 block that could be borded to 4 in. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|