|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 703
Likes: 449
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
I think a Magnum would make for a really cool racecar, and the 5.7 Hemi wouldn't be bad at 345, but it would be almost 4000 lbs in its lightest class (G/SA). I doubt the 5.7 at 345 would be as good as the LS1 in a GTO at 340.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
George,
Your reply made me think....I know the current GTO's did not come with a solid rear end, nor did the Corvettes yet, NHRA allows for solid rear ends to be used. I have seen both of these cars racing STK. I wonder what the criteria is for this, location must remain the same etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North Attleborough Ma.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
One thing with the GTO was the engine was proven to be competitive at it's HP rating, where the street 5.7 hasn't been raced much under NHRA stock rules to show what it can do. I compared the engine BP specs, the 5.7 Challenger motor is quite different, street motor c.r. 10.5 to 12.7, cam lift .482/.470 to .602/.569, different heads. Some big numbers there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 453
Likes: 115
Liked 127 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
Fred Lee has a really nice product that would make the IRS live if you wanted to stick with that setup.
http://etenterprises.com/challenger/
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|