|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 708
Likes: 13
Liked 319 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Check again Frank , 305-175 flattop-big cam carb and 305-215 TPI use all the same #'s and cc's . same cam ,416 head etc.
__________________
Lee Valentine 1661 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
14081005,004
10066015 I could have Memory failure, but seems like one or all three of those '85 FI intakes are not so good.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 07-31-2013 at 08:08 PM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Both engines are the same but for the top.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
I've seen batch fire and sequential mentioned how bout timed injection? Having the ability to dictate when the injector pulses would seem to be of benefit. Not sure how many systems offer this or how much time has been spent testing it.Spraying fuel into an active air column would seem at least in theory to have some potential gains.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Yes Ed, wasn't sure about others, my ECU-882 has that ability however I've yet to do any serious testing using it. Would be interesting to hear from someone that has. At higher engine speeds I'm imagining a serious amount of feul vapor being flying around in my manifold....is it a detriment or a help...I'm not sure.I've even wondered if my manifold design since it was made for a carb is a hinderence guess time will tell. BTW my car has ran as fast if not slightly faster with the EFI versus the carb, though again it may be contributed to the manifold and head design more than the actual delivery system....sure can't beat the EFI throttle response though.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Joe,
The V-6 engines you and I run might be the type engine that really benefits from EFI. As you know they are subject to some real weird pulses in the manifold. As you stated fuel in the intake a real problem. EFI could be a help. I have played with 5 different intake configurations to get the best. The best still has some crutches in to help the carb with mixture distribution. I think EFI would help because of the dry flow.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|