GM A Body Drive Line Angles

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

it ain't about "go fast", it's about getting these cars to work and neither would you know anything about!

Meanwhile, show us your car no mind another GM A body that has gone 1.28 60 foot with a bolt on suspenion, using all and nothing but the factory mounting points, nothing welded and no anti roll bar, launching off the footbrake and weighing 3900 lbs.

The Proof is in the Performance!

The only 3900 pound Chevelle that I know of that runs 1.28 60s is Joey's B/SA LS6 Chevelle. Again I will say how is it possible for this car to weigh 3900 pounds when I have the same all steel 68 that weighs 3720 with bolted in weight? This is the only full weight stock suspension Chevelle 1.2 60 your ever gonna see Ed, Ive been asking for years now to see your 1.2 60 foot from your 10 sec production block chevelle. The proofs in the time slip.

[442OLDS]

I was wondering the same thing.Unless you HAVE to weigh 3900 pounds in a Chevelle to make your legal Stock or Super Stock class weight,why would the car be that heavy and why would you run it that heavy all of the time?

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 442OLDS

I was wondering the same thing.Unless you HAVE to weigh 3900 pounds in a Chevelle to make your legal Stock or Super Stock class weight,why would the car be that heavy and why would you run it that heavy all of the time?

Hell, I had to put weight into my 68 so I could run at the weight everybody else claimed. This Eds car gets heavier every time he brings it up, don't forget the negative 1500 feet air the car was regularly raced in.

[1320racer]

same old bullsh_t from you, you can't do it so no one can and that time slip means nothing as it relates to this thread or your latest failed attempt to debunk my former Chevelle's performance.

Post the full time slip with track info and date along with a photo of the car with the competition number on the time slip, on the car!!

AGAIN, when I sold my Chevelle that weighed 3880 lbs. going down the track with my cast iron headed 468 under the hood along with power steering and power brakes at the conclusion of the 2008 season, NO ONE that Alf was aware of running his suspension had 60 footed as quick as my car including Joe's former ride that weighed less and was sold to Adam Landolfi in 2007, maybe 2006.

Believe what you want, I've got the time slip, Alf has seen it, Herb Mccandless jr. witnessed the run at Piedmont Dragway on 11/24/07 and saw the incrementals.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

same old bullsh_t from you, you can't do it so no one can.

Numerous replies by you in numerous threads on this site and others in your failed attempts to debunk my former Chevelle's performance.

AGAIN, when I sold my Chevelle that weighed 3880 lbs. going down the track with my cast iron headed 468 under the hood along with power steering and power brakes at the conclusion of the 2008 season, NO ONE that Alf was aware of running his suspension had 60 footed as quick as my car including Joe's former ride that weighed less and was sold to Adam Landolfi in 2007, maybe 2006.

Believe what you want, I've got the time slip, Alf has seen it, Herb Mccandless jr. witnessed the run at Piedmont Dragway on 11/24/07 and saw the incrementals.

I just want to see the time slip, should be simple to post it on up. Yes your car went some low 1.3s, but that not a big deal, and it sure doesn't weigh 3900 pounds. Come on Ed your not even turning the fan....

[Bob]

Originally Posted by HP HUNTER

The only 3900 pound Chevelle that I know of that runs 1.28 60s is Joey's B/SA LS6 Chevelle. Again I will say how is it possible for this car to weigh 3900 pounds when I have the same all steel 68 that weighs 3720 with bolted in weight? This is the only full weight stock suspension Chevelle 1.2 60 your ever gonna see Ed, Ive been asking for years now to see your 1.2 60 foot from your 10 sec production block chevelle. The proofs in the time slip.

IT WOULD SHURE BE NICE IF YOU TWO HANDLED YOUR DIFFERENCES IN PRIVATE!! NOT ALL OF US WANT TO SEE THIS S**T ALL THE TIME!!

Mark, thats a nice time slip. But without showing the whole time slip and matching car with number, it's about useless. I might also add that you are about 25 mph off for a low 10 second run. 113 MPH can be handled by a good K/SA car!!

Ed, at least give him props for posting something. What have you posted besides words and pics of your old car? If you really want to shut him up, post the slip. Surely you know how, as you have no problem posting pictures of your car. Or does your knowledge stop at gradiose self portrayal? Come on Ed, the whole S/SS community is watching.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by Bob

IT WOULD SHURE BE NICE IF YOU TWO HANDLED YOUR DIFFERENCES IN PRIVATE!! NOT ALL OF US WANT TO SEE THIS S**T ALL THE TIME!!

Mark, thats a nice time slip. But without showing the whole time slip and matching car with number, it's about useless. I might also add that you are about 25 mph off for a low 10 second run. 113 MPH can be handled by a good K/SA car!!



Ed, at least give him props for posting something. What have you posted besides words and pics of your old car? If you really want to shut him up, post the slip. Surely you know how, as you have no problem posting pictures of your car. Or does your knowledge stop at gradiose self portrayal? Come on Ed, the whole S/SS community is watching.

" I might also add that you are about 25 mph off for a low 10 second run. 113 MPH can be handled by a good K/SA car!!"

1.28
10.04
112 MPH
What were you saying about a K/SA car? Must be way under.

Really, thats a correction right at the 60 foot mark, heres another on the rear wheels @ 3600 pound on a small tire, stock suspension pump gas oval port. Save your uneducated comments for Ed.