|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 536 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=442OLDS;398598]If you go by the rulebook,if it doesn't run in one of the classes listed,it shouldn't be allowed to qualify.
Agreed 100%. NHRA has given the new cars a "safe haven" to run with no worry of added HP.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 953
Likes: 578
Liked 203 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]()
[quote=Jim Kaekel;398600]Jim, It would be my guess that NHRA is trying to tell us all something.
__________________
Mike Fuller 396 STK 3961 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 30
Liked 511 Times in 122 Posts
|
![]()
I may have been harsh, but gary is a friend and I know he actually BEGGED nhra not to reduce it, he was still #1 in T/S is what he wanted to be.
maybe because compared to the line of ponies in the mustang stable the mustang II was often referred to as a pos when it was new...well anyway if gary was offended ... sorry captain and if I got 20 off i'd need a torch cause I don't fit w/sa !!!!
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK "the Captain" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|