|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Again...instead of forcing everone to buy a product that a small minority THINKS solves a problem that 90% of the racers do not see as an issue. Why not instead spend the effort toward keeping people out of harms way? If you were to walk across a busy freeway without being conciuos of your surroundings and get hit...who's liable? Standing behind a car doing a burnout and expecting NOT to be hit by something, be it a rock, nut, bolt or collector is irresponsible.Didn't an entire funny car body get launched into the crowd at the Charlotte race? Anyone hurt? What's NHRA going to do with that? Face it racing is dangerous even as a spectator, nascar, NHRA, local tracks people have and will continue to get hurt both as particpants and those merely watching. Knee jerk reactions have never solved anything,only a way of saying they've addressed the "issue". Now that said if this winter the rule still stands I'll be looking for options to abide by the ruling.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 528
Liked 332 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
I am all for safety !!!! However when it comes to mandates and a solution that is equivalent in all aspects that can be fabricated by a racer for a "nominal" cost versus a NHRA approved manufacturers system for "hundreds" of dollars more I think bears looking into. Their has to be a happy ground here. Look at the engine diapers mandate. If you can fabricate a diaper that meets NHRA guidelines you do not need to purchase a "store bought" diaper--- this should be the same way too--- MY OPINION!!!!! FED 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1,116
Liked 900 Times in 191 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|