|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
You could experiment. Since you run at 43deg. Make a run at that timing. Then make a big change, 38 deg as a example. Then make a run. Look at your split times for both runs and see if it makes a difference. If you have a better back half at 38 but it runs the front half at 43deg best, then you are onto something. You can try this before investing in something. Just a thought.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What I was talking about is reducing timing on the start to kill power & help with traction. Some of the more powerful cars are cutting back timing at shift points. You would need a data logger to evaluate.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North Attleborough Ma.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I've seen improvements in heavy low compression cars, where you need a lot of timing in 1st and 2nd then pull it back in high. But that was years ago when the rules weren't as liberal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
|
![]()
My next door neighbor is a high speed retard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 132
Liked 140 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
^^^ Hahahaha...!!! ^^^
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|