|
|
|
|
11-19-2013, 10:45 AM
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
Re: GT classes
Cool, but not nearly as slippery as the newer jellybean cars. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 01:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: pa home of maple grove
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: GT classes
jeff lawerence is running a rwd 351c 88 mustang in Gt/aa...is doing very well in the class
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 08:00 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tomsriver nj
Posts: 479
Likes: 74
Liked 224 Times in 87 Posts
|
Re: GT classes
Just wondering why 1986 thunderbird is legal in ss , but 1987&1988 are not listed ? Is it what nobody called to get it in to the listings so it can be a legsl car like the 1986 ? If so who do you call and what you need to do ?
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2013, 02:16 PM
|
#4 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 372 Times in 130 Posts
|
Re: GT classes
Quote:
This very subject came up in a thread on this site. (link below) Post # 8 I questioned the same thing about using my '87 TC in SS. I think the general concensous was that any car listed in the classification guide was legal in SS, even if there were not 2 asteriks beside the h.p. number or a seperate SS column. I am going to send an e-mail to NHRA tech to try to find out. http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=50013 EDIT: I'm pretty sure the 87-88 TC body is legal in SS/GT with a V-8.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 11-30-2013 at 02:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
Re: GT classes
69 Corvette with New Factory motor ? WHich is the more bogus on HP?
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
