|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Ed, it has nothing to with logic, it is the reality of life. My car is in same same boat as yours and I don't plan on changing it any time soon. We all race our cars for different reasons. Some because they are emotionally attached to it, others because it's all they can afford and others because they want the latest-greatest.
But you have to accept that in racing, if you don't keep up you will be left behind. I just don't feel that everyone has a right to be competitive just because you made a previous investment in your car. Jim, you don't need $100,000 to race or win in Stock. But basically every HP rating is bogus. Do you think a 440 Mopar rated just over 400 makes that number, no it makes about 600-plus. Same for my small-block Ford, so what does it matter? No one would ever build a new car if the hp rating wasn't favorable. Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,734 Times in 2,233 Posts
|
![]()
Evan, the plus is not needed now. I am hoping it will be needed in 2014
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Correct! And I don't feel that anyone has a right to be competitive just because a sanctioning body rated a combo 100 hp. light. Sure don't blame a racer for picking a favorable combo. But I do blame sanctioning bodies for not insisting on a "close" rating and this dosen't just relate to new cars. This has been going on for quite some time.
Last edited by SS Engine Guy; 12-08-2013 at 11:15 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Bingo!!
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|