HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2014, 09:43 PM   #1
Don Anderson
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 155
Likes: 2,798
Liked 24 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

Sean,
1 1/2" Hooker Header with Ed`s collectors work on my Stocker.
Don Anderson
M/S #5342
Don Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 06:21 PM   #2
Alex Denysenko
Senior Member
 
Alex Denysenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan City IN
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

out of the box you can't beat the flowtechs for fit and performance we stock and sell a lot of them
we replaced them on Beth's car with a set of the headman step headers and saw virtually no improvement untill we installed mark' lelchock's collectors on them so ANY 5.0 stocker we build from scratch gets them and i would build another one if IHRA would ever get there act together and straighten out how about a minus 2.00 second under pure stocker? Fast and consistent so even a cripple like me could drive it and go rounds after qualifying #1
__________________
Alex Denysenko NHRA 3038 SS, 3305 STK - IHRA 6 SS, 330A STK
Moneymaker Racing LaPorte Indiana 219-861-1214
www.moneymakerracing.net
Alex Denysenko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 12:47 PM   #3
Sean Marconette
Senior Member
 
Sean Marconette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 977
Likes: 797
Liked 275 Times in 76 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

Thanks for all the responses. As others have found the results seem to be in the collectors. I have tried the original slip on collectors, the flowmaster scavenger merge collectors. All of these with and without an X-pipe. The flowmaster by far had the best results. I will be looking into the collectors that have been listed.

Thanks
Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette
84 Mustang
5060 SS/N
Sean Marconette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 02:30 AM   #4
D Styron
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

As far as the flow techs go is it worth the extra $100 or so to buy the ceramic coated version or is their coating not any good? No doubt Jet Hot would be better, but is it worth the extra $?
D Styron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 10:29 AM   #5
fordteacherguy
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 238
Likes: 38
Liked 160 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Styron View Post
As far as the flow techs go is it worth the extra $100 or so to buy the ceramic coated version or is their coating not any good? No doubt Jet Hot would be better, but is it worth the extra $?
The ceramic coat on Flowtechs is only on the outside, not on the inside of the tubes. less expensive and pretty under the hood, but the inside tubes do deteriorate. I like to buy the plain sets and have the headers coated inside and out and just do it once. They last much much longer and keep your engine from inhaling rust after it sits!

FYI, I also build my own merge collectors with the diy kits from Cone Engineering.

Last edited by fordteacherguy; 03-09-2014 at 10:33 AM.
fordteacherguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 10:46 AM   #6
Tand E racing
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Foxbody headers

Ditto on the cone engineering collectors worth the money. hedman #88390
Tand E racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.