|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
This is not true. The inline aftermarket heads are listed as acceptable for Boss 302 engine in SS for 1970.
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
The 68 302 with the Holley is legitimate and is a good combination. Based on the parts you already have it would certainly be the best way to go. As someone already noted, Nick Morris ran this engine in SSGT for several years and it was a stout runner. He has since switched to the 2010 352CJ in his Mustang, but he and his dad probably know the 68 engine as well as anyone out there.
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
What I find even more odd about this particular situation for the 1970 Boss is that while the classification guide shows that the inline head is legal there is actually a horsepower adjustment for the engine in SS when using aftermarket heads. It went to 305 HP on Jan 1 2012. That either says that someone actually built such a thing and went fast invoking an AHFS hit (highly doubtful) or the NHRA just slapped some number on it for the hell of it.
IMHO it is just flat out wrong to have the "&&" on that engine at all.
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Jim Kuntz knows the 1968 302 SS/GT combo very well. He and SE Buchannon hurt some feelings in a bad way to include current Pro Stocker Greg Stanfield
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|