HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2014, 02:29 AM   #1
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,110 Times in 304 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
I know you can't believe everything you see on the net. Makes sense though, what the HO package would be in the year before the four barrel 302 came out.


http://auto.howstuffworks.com/1982-1...d-mustang1.htm
Looked pretty accurate to me Mark. I test drove these cars while new in the showroom, and almost ordered a new 85 Mustang 5.0, and I still have factory sales brochures for 82,3,4,5,and 86 Mustangs, and Capris, which showed all the carburated 5.0 HOs were only available with a stick. NHRA may allow automatics , but Ford never made them that way.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 04:03 PM   #2
rawhide
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

nhraracer.com has put out a notice today that the 82 model GT is stick only and has released pistons specs also.
Roland
rawhide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 06:33 PM   #3
Joe Toller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Glad I quit when I did! I wonder who complained?
__________________
Joe Toller
Lewistown, MT
Joe Toller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 09:43 AM   #4
JHeath
Senior Member
 
JHeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 786
Likes: 2,876
Liked 370 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Piston specs are for 2011-2014 302 engine.
__________________
Jerry Heath
I/S '93 Cobra
FS/J 2010 Mustang "Ebay CJ"
JHeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 01:22 PM   #5
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 2,928
Liked 5,147 Times in 1,964 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Toller View Post
Glad I quit when I did! I wonder who complained?
Too much talk about it on Class Racer
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 02:30 PM   #6
Joe Toller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Nice, a guy has to almost keep everything a secret to run a car. What's the point in helping others out or building a car if you can't trust someone will take it out from under you?
__________________
Joe Toller
Lewistown, MT
Joe Toller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 03:03 PM   #7
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,110 Times in 304 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Toller View Post
Nice, a guy has to almost keep everything a secret to run a car. What's the point in helping others out or building a car if you can't trust someone will take it out from under you?
If somebody chooses to build a real combination that was actually offered to the general public in a configuration that includes the transmission the engine was available with, there should be no issues. However, if somebody finds a loophole that they most likely KNOW is bogus, well, that sounds like cheating, and in a such a situation, you might want to keep such indescretions "top secret". Of course, if you get caught after the fact, with a bogus combination, well, should that be a big suprise? I doubt that anybody would be brazen enough to show up with a 67-69 Camaro Z/28 302 with an automatic, just because a less popular combination may not be as well known is no excuse to try to pull the wool over Tech and other racers eyes. I have no idea what caused NHRA to CORRECT the 82 302 Mustang and Capri MISTAKE, but it was a mistake, and I am glad it was corrected.
(ps), Obviously my first sentence does not apply to cars 2008 and newer!
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 03:06 PM   #8
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Well, if it's not legit to begin with you will always run the risk of losing out. (Unless you get NHRA on your side. Cases in point: 459 manifolds on 283s, automatic in a '70 Camaro 402-375, Holley carb on a 351 Cleveland, etc.)
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:22 PM   #9
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 2,928
Liked 5,147 Times in 1,964 Posts
Default Re: 302 Ford 2V

Still a darn good stick car!
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.