|
![]() |
#11 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 878
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
Isn't this exactly the opposite of the NHRA vision of the future.............
New car bodies in GT with OLD MUSCLECAR Horsepower........... Now we can have old cars bodies in GT with new engine horsepower..... My, my how times have changed..... Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
The only thing this will accomplish now would be that all the new cars will run GT instead of SS to save their combo from getting horsepower. Just as several do now with the 3 tenths harder index!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
Or SS230 someone could take a 68 Cuda AH body and install a new 426 hemi in it for GT/BB, or everyone's favorite a 69 Camaro with the new 427 Chevy in a class lower GT/CC. New tech, the parts, new adventure.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Yes while I understand the concept, it's just my opinion that the changing of classes to avoid horsepower hits would happen more than old cars and new motors. Having said that it would give the older cars another class to go to to avoid heads up!
Gary Norman Last edited by SS 230; 09-27-2014 at 07:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 25
Liked 13 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The person that already has a fwd gt car but wants to run the more current engines this needs to happen. Right now you have to go modified in order to go faster equals more money and less durability.Who do we have to call to get this done? John
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
What is wrong with avoiding a heads up, remember stock and super stock are mostly a bracket race.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 5
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
How about GT /double AA and trippel AAA ???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 153
Likes: 70
Liked 388 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
Would like to see this thread stay constructive !! The 8# break is so outdated . Even a lot of the old traditional combinations have gained HP over the last 10 years ,making it hard to run A or B but it rules out most of the new combinations. At a time when we need more interest in SS , why doesn't NHRA move on this?? Like it or not ,fuel injection-blowers-4-valve overhead cams,and more ,are here to stay! We should be elated that the factories are behind drag racing as much as they are!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|