|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]() Sorry, thought I typed 5. Fat fingers, lol I wouldn't mind running the Chevrolet Performance Class, but once again, the closest race is 2 hours away, the rest or 7 or more. Having a series large enough to have divisionals, and I would start building tomorrow. Last edited by Tony Corley; 03-30-2015 at 08:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
It looks like it will be a fun class. I am building one. I should have it at Atlanta.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
Atlanta is the close race to me, lol. What are you building?
Edit. Just saw the Formula. Should be a great combo. Am I wrong in believing a class like this would quickly grow in the NHRA? Last edited by Tony Corley; 03-30-2015 at 09:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 163
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
try this: late model ford, mopar,chevy. 429,426,427, crate engines small blks
N/A, 3400lbs, stick no pro stock type tranmission or auto, fiberglass hood only, 9 inch tire only, 3 tenth's pro tree, call it jr pro stock your 2 cents ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Start a heads up, cheap class and gradually they will see the "light" and enjoy it. Some just hate change...because it might affect them.. From Running a Heads up S and SS series I KNOW the racers LOVE it when given a chance...(this with current cars not a change of rules) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elizabeth City, NC
Posts: 47
Likes: 80
Liked 25 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
I'm not sure I want in on this but here goes.
Some road racing groups have a power to weight ratio check. They bring a chassis dyno and a scale to the events. Without getting into all the math about areas under the power curve, that seems simple enough. Over your power to weight limit and you're done (check after the race) or you put on weight (check before the race). Part of the racing entry fee pays for the dyno pull. NASA does this for some of their classes. Could there be an opportunity here to: 1. police the HP factors? 2. create a "new eliminator" based on power (real, not imagined) and weight for heads up runs? other ideas? I really liked Billy's 5K claimer idea. He'd be making money hand over fist.... Jeff Laferty
__________________
Jeff Laferty Suffolk, VA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 133
Liked 524 Times in 84 Posts
|
![]()
Call it Modified Eliminator. All cars with hood scoops (not original equipment), along with alterds and dragsters can run this class. Kind of like combining the current Competition Eliminator with the Modified cars that run in SS.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|