|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Then it's just ET brackets. That ain't racing.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaverdam, Va./ Port St. Lucie,Fla.
Posts: 362
Likes: 177
Liked 154 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
66W30POST |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Québec Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Stock Class engine rules will remain and first qualifier will get bye run with impair field. What are benefits with heads up?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 1,954
Liked 10,830 Times in 2,251 Posts
|
![]()
The smile on your face after the run!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Part of the "platform" issue is that some combinations receive horsepower while the same engine in a different body does not. The HP factor is an expression of an engine potential. An engine either has a certain power potential or it does not. The idea that an engine can receive HP hits in one body and it somehow makes sense that you can move that drivetrain to another body to start over with a clean slate on HP factoring is nonsensical.
While you can obviously argue that one 'platform' *utilizes* that HP more efficiently than another, it is logical that if a HP factor is raised on an engine in one platform, it should be raised on all platforms: perhaps just by a different amount. The proper way to do it would be to have the same HP across the board for a given engine combination, adjusted by a 'platform factor'. Unfortunately, this is little more than an academic discussion, despite it not really being much more complicated than they've already made it. 'Course you also have several classes in which sticks and automatics are run combined, where the automatics get a weight break in some classes, but not in others. Figure that out.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 2,175
Liked 2,355 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
Stock is a performance based class. Heads-up runs are the best part. Take them away and we might as well just run the local bracket race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
What he said X 2. Is that correct. Actually I like no platform, motor only. What has evolved is since platforms were made part of the program, like the LS1 in the Vette is 35 or so less than the Camaro. It's called "Pick & Choose Platforms" so now you can pick your friends, your nose, and your platform. Maybe not in that order.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|