|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
You must have only read one set of rules. There are 2 sets I linked. One for Coyote Stock, and one for Chevrolet Performance Stock. The same premise could be followed with Chrysler to include them. They also have several crate engines that are similar in hp to the Chevrolet and Ford.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 353
Likes: 95
Liked 226 Times in 74 Posts
|
![]()
A CS build on another site http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...light=maverick
I watched the CS at NMRA at Norwalk and was impressed nearly every car had a 4 or 5 speed and it was a fun class to watch BUT Stock has soooo much more variety with Chargers GTOs older mustangs etc could you make a larger older car such as a chevelle,charger,gto etc compete against a sea of mustangs in this class? Im not racing a fox and be like everybody else!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
In the Chevrolet Performance rules, they have made the minimum weight higher so that older cars will be more competitive. Think they also get a slight weight break, and a few concessions chassis wise. The Coyote Stock class has some concessions also for the older cars, there are just so many Fox Bodies that were laying around, that's what most are running.
Obviously, if NHRA were to pick up something like these classes, adjustments could be made to make certain the older cars were just as competitive as the new. I never said these rules should be used verbatim, just showed how simple they were. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|