|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
It's funny how people still cry about payouts and costs of racing all the time.
Have you looked around the pits and seen what people use to get there? Not too many open trailers??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,820
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,127 Times in 1,955 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
God bless my friends that can still do that, but it can't sustain with the current situation in our government. Ask Dan, Mark, Joe Jr. and a few more how hard it is to do this professionally. Better yet, ask Michael Beard. We wins often, with a bare bones operation, but still uses other sources for income. There are a few independent promoters that could sustain Sportsman racing, in the right venues and locations, but people or going to have to forsake the Wally thing, or go down with the ship...in my opinion.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 3,395
Liked 1,829 Times in 427 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,121
Likes: 1,579
Liked 1,856 Times in 420 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Seriously. That's like trying to argue that the payout should be based on how much money and/or property the winner has. Really, race rigs have nothing at all to do with payouts vs. the actual cost of racing. Facts are facts, every single thing used to actually race a car has gone up considerably in the last 15 years, some stuff as much as 100% or more. So have the fees NHRA charges. Yet NHRA has not increased the purse for over a decade, and their policies have forced most potential contingency sponsors to refuse to be involved in the contingency program. Not to mention what NHRA spends on salaries and perks. While they pay the personnel (tech people, track crew, safety crew, etc) who actually make the races possible a mere pittance. Really, the "look how much you have, why are you complaining?" argument is why we are where we are (that's as far as I'll go with "politics" out of respect for Ken and his rules). Again, I respect you and your opinion, and believe you are absolutely entitled to your opinion. But I vehemently disagree with the reasoning behind it. No doubt the economy actually is really bad. Trust me when I say it has really hit home for some of us. But NHRA has simply followed a horrific business model for every thing they do for every part of the sport, and that is the single biggest reason the stands are empty, and the pits are starting to get that way. They've been on a short sighted, short term, immediate bottom line plan for a long time, and the result speaks for itself.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Who said race rigs had anything to do with payouts??
It's hard to listen to people crying about the payout not being enough when you pull through the gate with the stuff they do now. It is the same way in dirt track racing as their payout is crap but the haulers keep getting bigger all the time. So money should not be an issue to many the way it looks ![]() How many racers didn't know the payout before they bought their race rigs? Last edited by Dale Rethke; 06-12-2015 at 10:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,121
Likes: 1,579
Liked 1,856 Times in 420 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It looks like you answered your first question with the last two sentences in your own post. And the answer is YOU. You are absolutely making the argument that it is perfectly acceptable to make the payout inversely proportional to the amount of money someone spends on their tow rig. That's completely absurd.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
How do you figure that?
If you have a problem with the payout why would you spend so much doing it if it money was a problem for you. If you think you race for the money you better think again. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,121
Likes: 1,579
Liked 1,856 Times in 420 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Again, that has nothing to do with it. Leave the rig out of it, the rig does not matter, either. Once again, you're making the argument that it is okay to treat people poorly, and take advantage of them, if they let you, and especially if they have money. That's an absolutely fabulous position by the way, you should be very proud of it. (It's also evidently a great business model for a "non profit" organization supposedly dedicated to the racers). ![]() The cost of parts has gone up. The cost of race fuel has gone up. The cost of labor has gone up. The cost of supplies (oil, transmission fluid, brake fluid, etc) has gone up. The entry fee has gone up. The other fess have gone up. The salaries of NHRA executives has gone up. The only things that have not gone up? The purse, and the contingency payout. Like I said, you're entitled to your opinion, and I think I'll just leave you to it. ![]()
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
Liked 21 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Anyway, this thread seemed to drift off the original topic so I digress...... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|