HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2015, 05:01 PM   #41
dhofer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss wannabee View Post
So I believe I saw you guys run...do you recall the times for both cars? Were you able
to use the aluminum PG?





Yes we used an aluminum PG, it allowed us to add a fair amount in the truck area because we were 100 lbs under the listed weight. We never really got the car figured out in SS/X our best time was slightly under the 14.70 min. that worked out OK until the record got bombed down to I think 14.35 or something like that. Moving everything to SS/W had a 14.31 min. and the car went a best of 13.76. It would run under 14 just about anywhere. We sold it at the end of 72 while it still had the MPH record.
Dave
dhofer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2015, 07:23 PM   #42
mtkawboy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Billings Mt
Posts: 282
Likes: 186
Liked 54 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Vacuum leaks were hard to stop back in those days on those Rochester 2 barrels.
mtkawboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 12:32 AM   #43
Larry Miller Jr
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gettysburg PA
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Frank Jordan SS/X , He had some neat stories about that car, would have been cool to race in that era.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	frank winner circle 1 (800x582).jpg
Views:	1232
Size:	234.7 KB
ID:	29713  
Larry Miller Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 08:44 AM   #44
dhofer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtkawboy View Post
Vacuum leaks were hard to stop back in those days on those Rochester 2 barrels.
So very true!!
dhofer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 09:39 AM   #45
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Don't think the 283 would drop to X, even with PG
There were no automatic classes from about U and lower.
I believe Dave is correct.
Not entirely correct, Mark. Even though the lower SS classes didn't have an "A" on
them...NHRA grouped the autos and sticks together...in the same class for awhile.
SS/X had BOTH autos and stick cars together...proof is right here on this thread....
It appears that the '57's..the '60's like "Bits-n-Pieces"...the "Copper-
Stopper"...(note logo on rf fender in photo.."3-spd trans by")..and Frank Jordan's car
(note Hays decal) were 3-speed sticks...Mr Hofer here chose to build his "61 as a
pg car...(and weren't the Olds' hydramatics?)

So BOTH sticks and autos TOGETHER in SS/X class...for awhile...and this was true
also in SS/R...SS/T...SS/U...SS/V...and SS/W...you could build a car as auto or stick
and it would have that designation...but this only happened for 2 or 3 years...Maybe
"Q" as well?
Another example was that photo I posted a while back..the SS/V '72 Nats trophy
Hedworth vs Vaubel...you ever see Val try to "row" a stick? Both pg cars despite
no "A" in the designation....

The confusing part is a couple of years later...NHRA "split" the lower SS classes
into separate "stick" and "auto." Remember...SS/QA...SS/RA...SS/TA...ss/UA?
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 10:12 AM   #46
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Back again...had to leave and couldn't finish the last entry! This separation of the
lower SS auto and stick cars only lasted a year or two...I'm going to say about 1976
or '77? By 1978, SS/P (and PA) were the lowest classes (I think?)

I wasn't involved in the "pulse" of class racing at that time...and would welcome the
veteran members here who participated those years to correct me or add comments.
Don't have any Nat Dragsters, programs, or other sources of info...I think I tossed all
of them years ago...so I'm going on my feeble memory....

I do recall Vic Holley from the Midwest...being the SS/TA record holder for a bit in
a 220 hp big '66 Chevy...also maybe D2 Ronnie Charnes in a similar SS/TA...
before he went to a Camaro stocker...but that's all I remember?

Not 100% sure...but I think the reason they separated the autos from the sticks
was it was thought that the 3-spd...despite the "gaps" in ratios...was still good for
.1-2 tenths quicker than the autos at that time....and maybe the "auto" racers
"bitched" to NHRA? A 4-spd...if you could get a combo in the lower classes would
be even faster...

Think I saw a '66 Chev big wagon in SS/U running 220hp/4-spd...racing
against '55 Chev 180hp-PG cars for class....

I wonder if the SS/X class lasted a year or 2 later than previously stated...maybe
into '74 or '75? Of course later on, there was a SS/X class for V-6 SS cars....
but we're not talking about that here....
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 01:22 PM   #47
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss wannabee View Post
Not entirely correct, Mark. Even though the lower SS classes didn't have an "A" on
them...NHRA grouped the autos and sticks together...in the same class for awhile.
SS/X had BOTH autos and stick cars together...proof is right here on this thread....
It appears that the '57's..the '60's like "Bits-n-Pieces"...the "Copper-
Stopper"...(note logo on rf fender in photo.."3-spd trans by")..and Frank Jordan's car
(note Hays decal) were 3-speed sticks...Mr Hofer here chose to build his "61 as a
pg car...(and weren't the Olds' hydramatics?)

So BOTH sticks and autos TOGETHER in SS/X class...for awhile...and this was true
also in SS/R...SS/T...SS/U...SS/V...and SS/W...you could build a car as auto or stick
and it would have that designation...but this only happened for 2 or 3 years...Maybe
"Q" as well?
Another example was that photo I posted a while back..the SS/V '72 Nats trophy
Hedworth vs Vaubel...you ever see Val try to "row" a stick? Both pg cars despite
no "A" in the designation....

The confusing part is a couple of years later...NHRA "split" the lower SS classes
into separate "stick" and "auto." Remember...SS/QA...SS/RA...SS/TA...ss/UA?
Need to clarify then.
We were originally talking about the 57 2 dr wagon, and whether or not it could be a 283 in SS/X, even with the extra weight of the cast iron PG. I was pointing out that no, it wouldn't make the class.I believe that is correct.

What I meant is there was no separate automatic classes below I think , 18lbs.
There were plenty of automatic cars running in the stick shift classes back in the day.
Hudsons, Oldsmobiles etc. ; sometimes using the additional weight of the PG or Hydramatic to get down to the next lower class.

Paul Dilcher was a winner back then with a 55 2 dr.HT with a Powerglide, in SS/U.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 09:31 AM   #48
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Need to clarify then.
We were originally talking about the 57 2 dr wagon, and whether or not it could be a 283 in SS/X, even with the extra weight of the cast iron PG. I was pointing out that no, it wouldn't make the class.I believe that is correct.

What I meant is there was no separate automatic classes below I think , 18lbs.
There were plenty of automatic cars running in the stick shift classes back in the day.
Hudsons, Oldsmobiles etc. ; sometimes using the additional weight of the PG or Hydramatic to get down to the next lower class.

Paul Dilcher was a winner back then with a 55 2 dr.HT with a Powerglide, in SS/U.
Mark, I got it now...I'd be real interested in finding out how many of those 5 entries
at Indy were '57 cars vs '60 cars but if too much trouble...we can stop right here....
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 10:22 AM   #49
dhofer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ss/x

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss wannabee View Post
Mark, I got it now...I'd be real interested in finding out how many of those 5 entries
at Indy were '57 cars vs '60 cars but if too much trouble...we can stop right here....
I found some old pictures your 1972. The brown two door wagon I was talking about looks like a 1956( so probably a 265 CI) but I can't tell for sure since I only have a small portion of the car in the picture. The name on the side is " Slater & Packered" I think and it has " Points Champion" Toronto International Raceway on the side. I can't scan the photo but I hope this helps
Dave
dhofer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 06:27 PM   #50
qwiked
Junior Member
 
qwiked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Liberty Lake, WA, Peoria,AZ
Posts: 80
Likes: 195
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Ss/x

The best combination for SS/X had to be Yakima, Washington's Pruitt-Reid-Heinson 1963 Ford Custom 300 2 door Sedan..260 2v, 162 HP, T 10 4spd, 6:50 9" ....many times #1 qualifier and many times protested..those were the days..talk about dime rocket she was a nickel rocket..
qwiked is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.