|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,817
Likes: 2,907
Liked 5,125 Times in 1,953 Posts
|
![]()
Kevin,
I've been avoiding this one, hoping someone else would handle it. You are pretty much correct in your analysis I believe. The theory behind the 7" is #1, lighter weight, which is always good, and # 2, to be able to achieve a higher stall without having to bend the pump fins into much of a negative configuration. Now, seeing the stator is actually physically smaller than the 8" Opel style unit, you are going to have a hard time getting a fabricated 7" stator to be able to multiply the same amount of torque as the 8". Remember, at the approx. 2 to 1 multiplication ratio , the more torque you start with, the more you'll have after the converter. If your car is in the middle of the pack now ( not necessarily yours personally), you can see where the problem lies. There are still plenty of top qualifying SBC cars that are still using 8" converters. If your car is not there yet, you'd be wise to spend your money elsewhere right now. The 7" converter is not going to be the magic bullet you're looking for...in my opinion.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 57
Liked 507 Times in 116 Posts
|
![]()
We tried a 7 inch convertor in my wife's GT/JA 85 Cutlass 327/250 PG. Back to back with our normal 8in convertor it lost a tenth. Flashed 200 RPM more that the 8 inch. We found the convertor was falling back on the flash point when it shifted. We lost a few hundredths in 60 ft as well.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
Kevin,
I just when through the discovery process of 7" vs 8" with the Super 10. My final decision came after talking at length with Gary Hettler and Charlie Plott with ATI. ATI built me a high stall, mechanical diode 8" converter that is the cat's meow ![]()
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I have two friends that went to 7" converters in their SS/GT carbureted cars. Already fast, sorted out cars. Both picked up everywhere. I decided I had to have one of those!
Two 7" iterations later, my 8" ATI was still quicker and faster. Depends on the combo, like many other things. Or, I'm doing something very wrong. A strong possibility. LOL LT1 SS car, 3 speed.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 576
Likes: 298
Liked 748 Times in 137 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for all the replays guys. We seem to be seeing a pattern here.
Hopefully the converter supplier will work with me on exchanging it for an 8"....I would certainly hope so since he recommended the 7".... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Could race weight and RPM range of the two examples be factors in the 7" converters working? Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
7 inch convertor typical stall is in the 6000-9000 RPM range
8 inch convertor typical stall is in the 4000-7000 RPM range Where is your peak power? If its in the lower end of those ranges a 7 will not help you |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I'm thinking so. Both lighter cars, both with Quadrajets, both rev higher than mine.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|