|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
Mike, your post on this thread are the best I've read in a long time, love the Obama comment, LMAO, right on!
__________________
Ashton Hudson SS/CS 4373 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Also, a class that does not even exist, that effects no class that does exist, should bother absolutely no one. I know when they implemented Pro Mod, It effected me not at all, and I gave it zero thought other then I like it.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 288
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
"Everyone should be able to win at heads up racing regardless how much time and money they spend" Obama.
I think that's is how you stated it. Funny comment and but ... You have missed the fact that in eliminator when you take out your shoe polish to put your dial in on the window you are getting your Obama handicap help. You are no longer truly racing someone, you are playing the clock with shoe polish dial in as an equalizer. It was intended to allow various classes to compete together since the variations in cars and classes became massive by expansion of number of classes. The other facts about winning class regardless how much you work or spend is incorrect because you imply a $10,000 car is proposed to run in a class with the guys who have invested $150,000 in a factory car. No that wasn't intended in any of my posts. An economy class of cars to attract more new racers or as a place for everyone to race who honestly cannot invest $35,000 in a motor or high buck trans . Also might reread the posts on Dime Rockets where guys brag about being #1 Qualifier with a ________( name the unfactored rule book oversight). Pick up, Turbo van, etc. Lots of fun in this topic but hoping to keep the thoughts clearly separated for what was proposed versus how people interpret the ideas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Facts about savings for a class of Econo Mod with proposed rules.
(also fastest growing class in round track with these rules) Spec unmod Al Brodix heads and cast manifold savings-----------$15,000 Clutch rule, no computer, no pan evac system savings-------------$7,000 Stock Diameter cam and lifter rule savings-------------------------------$1000 9" Deck block rule, No titanium drive line parts-savings -------------?????? The rules used can be re posted Stick car rules save $23-25,000. Tech with scope in pan or heads. Just wanted to add these amounts to suggest the value of changing one Mod class rule set or adding to save costs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,599 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
A Mopar small block has a 9.6" deck height and Ford has 3 deck heights: 8.2, 9.2 and 9.5. By the way, Titanium is already prohibited in the Modified classes. So, you have to pull the timing cover to check the cam diameter? Like I someone said earlier, local tracks can run such type of class, at national event level, it will not happen. It would require a teardown at every event. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
As far as I know, titanium lug nuts, yokes, and wheel studs are legal in modified. Correct me if I'm wrong. And the tear down is very simple in my opinion. Any 4150 carb. (No tear down) any stroke, (no tear down) cast intake with no external miss, (no tear down) any combustion chamber mod, (no tear down) angle mill all you want, (no tear down) intake and exhaust ports can't be altered,(no tear down, just a bore scope) if questionable, tear down. Min 10.5" clutch, no counter weights, one disc, no tear down.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
A spec motor class will never happen in NHRA. You have a better chance of turning Obuma into a Republican first........
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Gonna have to splain to me how you save $7000 in the clutch rule by not allowing data loggers or pan evac systems. Pan evac= less than $100 entry level datalogger can be had for $600 since everyone already owns a laptop that's a wash on cost. I'm aware of at least one "econo" circle track series in my area, believe me when you limit one thing many dollars get spent on something else to enhance performance. Bottom line any "limited" class series will quickly spiral out of control merely because there WILL be someone that is willing to spend what ever it takes to be the fastest. It's been proven over and over. Oh and since the stick cars are limited...I'll assume there will be a "spec" torque converter and everyone runs a bone stock power glide right?
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 Last edited by buzzinhalfdozen; 10-30-2015 at 09:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|