|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Facts about savings for a class of Econo Mod with proposed rules.
(also fastest growing class in round track with these rules) Spec unmod Al Brodix heads and cast manifold savings-----------$15,000 Clutch rule, no computer, no pan evac system savings-------------$7,000 Stock Diameter cam and lifter rule savings-------------------------------$1000 9" Deck block rule, No titanium drive line parts-savings -------------?????? The rules used can be re posted Stick car rules save $23-25,000. Tech with scope in pan or heads. Just wanted to add these amounts to suggest the value of changing one Mod class rule set or adding to save costs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,604 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
A Mopar small block has a 9.6" deck height and Ford has 3 deck heights: 8.2, 9.2 and 9.5. By the way, Titanium is already prohibited in the Modified classes. So, you have to pull the timing cover to check the cam diameter? Like I someone said earlier, local tracks can run such type of class, at national event level, it will not happen. It would require a teardown at every event. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
As far as I know, titanium lug nuts, yokes, and wheel studs are legal in modified. Correct me if I'm wrong. And the tear down is very simple in my opinion. Any 4150 carb. (No tear down) any stroke, (no tear down) cast intake with no external miss, (no tear down) any combustion chamber mod, (no tear down) angle mill all you want, (no tear down) intake and exhaust ports can't be altered,(no tear down, just a bore scope) if questionable, tear down. Min 10.5" clutch, no counter weights, one disc, no tear down.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
A spec motor class will never happen in NHRA. You have a better chance of turning Obuma into a Republican first........
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Gonna have to splain to me how you save $7000 in the clutch rule by not allowing data loggers or pan evac systems. Pan evac= less than $100 entry level datalogger can be had for $600 since everyone already owns a laptop that's a wash on cost. I'm aware of at least one "econo" circle track series in my area, believe me when you limit one thing many dollars get spent on something else to enhance performance. Bottom line any "limited" class series will quickly spiral out of control merely because there WILL be someone that is willing to spend what ever it takes to be the fastest. It's been proven over and over. Oh and since the stick cars are limited...I'll assume there will be a "spec" torque converter and everyone runs a bone stock power glide right?
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 Last edited by buzzinhalfdozen; 10-30-2015 at 09:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
don,t have one |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
I guess I will end my comments on this post with a couple of questions.
Why do people complain about the high cost of a motor and not want to evaluate a way to curb the costs? Why do people complain about the soft factors of this motor or that factory car and not want to consider the lb. / cubic inch methods more? Why do people express concerns about NO crowd in the stands for points meets when S and SS are the major competitors and not admit the dial in program might be the issue? Why do racers who competed in TOP/STK and TOP/SS explain it was the most fun they had in years racing heads up instead of dial in? Why do racers comment on the fact the majority of the current racers are at retirement age and attracting new blood seems difficult but not want to help create an entry level full size car or class to attract more people? Even more interesting is why people want to comment negatively when it would not affect the car they currently run but might offer a cheaper alternative later? The basic question many have is why does Dick Butler who does not currently race care? Friends Drag Racing is a wonderful sport and I always want to offer thoughts which might bring it back to where it has been in popularity and can return for the future at the Sportsman racer level. Thank you.....for participating in the thinking and discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Again, it effects no one. I just don't see why the ire. It would effect no ones combo.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|