HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2016, 08:02 AM   #1
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by rowdyboys31 View Post
Alan, looks like NHRA is already doing that with factory HP on a few newer street cars. Here's a few I found 2009 mustang GT 4.6 factory 300hp/NHRA Guide 270hp, 2010 mustang GT 4.6 factory 315hp/ NHRA Guide270hp, 2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 Hemi factory 470hp/NHRA Guide 380hp/New389hp.JK
Of the ones you listed, it appears that Jeff Teuton with the 2013 Challenger @ 380 hp is the only competitive car out there.
Last year his Challenger was over 1.1 sec. under in B/SA and C/SA.
I haven't seen this years stats yet.

The 2010 Camaro is the only production year Camaro listed since 2002 and even it seems rated too high @ 400 hp. Not sure if anyone has tried that combo yet.

The '05-'14 Mustang combos are not competitive, IMO.
The '11-'14 Coyote Mustangs are rated more than a CJ....with pretty much the same engine.

I still think NHRA should rate the newer cars @ 80% of the dealer brochure advertised hp...then let the AHFS system take care of the fast cars.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 09:45 AM   #2
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 632
Liked 1,987 Times in 599 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
Of the ones you listed, it appears that Jeff Teuton with the 2013 Challenger @ 380 hp is the only competitive car out there.
Last year his Challenger was over 1.1 sec. under in B/SA and C/SA.
I haven't seen this years stats yet.

The 2010 Camaro is the only production year Camaro listed since 2002 and even it seems rated too high @ 400 hp. Not sure if anyone has tried that combo yet.

The '05-'14 Mustang combos are not competitive, IMO.
The '11-'14 Coyote Mustangs are rated more than a CJ....with pretty much the same engine.

I still think NHRA should rate the newer cars @ 80% of the dealer brochure advertised hp...then let the AHFS system take care of the fast cars.
If they put the newer street cars in the guide it should start at the advertised factoryHP then go up or down as needed per the AHFS. This has been the way it has been done since the start.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 10:39 AM   #3
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

On a new unfactored car, nhra should add 100 HP to the factory hp rating and let the race off HP. Why should a new combo jump to the head of qualifying. If nhra had done that in the beginning, old and new would be competing on the same level now.

Casey Miles
248 H
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 12:17 PM   #4
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
On a new unfactored car, nhra should add 100 HP to the factory hp rating and let the race off HP. Why should a new combo jump to the head of qualifying. If nhra had done that in the beginning, old and new would be competing on the same level now.

Casey Miles
248 H
Nobody is going to build a new car with a NHRA rating factored 100 hp higher than the factory hp.

Not going to happen.

JMO
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 12:43 PM   #5
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,198
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
Nobody is going to build a new car with a NHRA rating factored 100 hp higher than the factory hp.
You speak the truth. I purchased a new 2010 BIW in early 2010. When they released the spec. and HP I pushed it into a corner.

The 2015 spec. should be out soon........
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 03:24 PM   #6
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
Nobody is going to build a new car with a NHRA rating factored 100 hp higher than the factory hp.

Not going to happen.

JMO
So in stead of being able to run 1.5 under, with the 100 HP added, they could only go .50 under. I could care less if the big 3 make their race cars or not. If they didn't, Stock would be a backward category again, don't have to spend 100 k to be competive. One row of Copo at Indy last year was at least $1.2 million dollars of value. People are still going to purchase them. But buying one of those purpose built cars shouldn't send you to the top of qualifying sheets. They should have to pay their dues just like the older cars.

Casey Miles
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 03:30 PM   #7
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,198
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
So in stead of being able to run 1.5 under, with the 100 HP added, they could only go .50 under. I could care less if the big 3 make their race cars or not. If they didn't, Stock would be a backward category again, don't have to spend 100 k to be competive. One row of Copo at Indy last year was at least $1.2 million dollars of value. People are still going to purchase them. But buying one of those purpose built cars shouldn't send you to the top of qualifying sheets. They should have to pay their dues just like the older cars
Dude, you don't have a clue!
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 03:35 PM   #8
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
So in stead of being able to run 1.5 under, with the 100 HP added, they could only go .50 under. I could care less if the big 3 make their race cars or not. If they didn't, Stock would be a backward category again, don't have to spend 100 k to be competive. One row of Copo at Indy last year was at least $1.2 million dollars of value. People are still going to purchase them. But buying one of those purpose built cars shouldn't send you to the top of qualifying sheets. They should have to pay their dues just like the older cars.

Casey Miles
Casey:
I am only talking about factory production line ( street ) cars with VINs.

None of what I have commented on in my posts have anything to do with the Factory Stock cars. ( COPO, DP, CJ )

Please do not get the 2 types of Stockers confused.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 03:39 PM   #9
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

So spending nothing on your car as well as no time and showing up should give you the same chance as the guys who do?

That is some pretty slanted logic there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
So in stead of being able to run 1.5 under, with the 100 HP added, they could only go .50 under. I could care less if the big 3 make their race cars or not. If they didn't, Stock would be a backward category again, don't have to spend 100 k to be competive. One row of Copo at Indy last year was at least $1.2 million dollars of value. People are still going to purchase them. But buying one of those purpose built cars shouldn't send you to the top of qualifying sheets. They should have to pay their dues just like the older cars.

Casey Miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2016, 04:25 PM   #10
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Stock is supposed to be an entry-level catagory, and spending money shouldn't be the barometer on how your car performs. Stock has been corrupted by after market influencs. Btw, I've been racing the same car for over 40 years and it's had a factor on even before I started racing it.
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.