|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: kansas
Posts: 235
Likes: 495
Liked 249 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]()
I'm thinking that the numbers in the chart are percentages of the 300 and 400 disks in the flow meter. Just my guess.
Pete |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting theory! I can't dispute it, but if the represent percentages, then that would reflect less than "advertised" (if you will) flow at those lifts on the given valve?
__________________
Jesse Kauk 6986 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Okay cool, I like to hear the word "typical" in a discussion about this type of thing.
So how specifically does one read it? Does info on the sheet (other than written 400/300cfm) reflect 400cfm (INT) and 300cfm (EXH)? I guess I'm looking for a baseline. Are we looking at something that demonstrates: 400cfm was supplied on the intake side and the flow rate was 85% of 400cfm at .700 lift? I suppose long story short is, how do I relatively accurately, translate the numbers on this sheet into CFM flow rates at specific lifts. I may be reading too deep into this, if it's a typical flow sheet I suppose I could supply to a cam grinder and they'd know exactly what they're looking at? Other than that, it's to satisfy my curiosity as someone who is new to this world. Thanks guys so far, look forward to more insight!
__________________
Jesse Kauk 6986 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
There isn't enough information on the sheet to know the exact flow . A few missing numbers are , Temperature , and the test pressure . Typically the test pressure is 28" , but some flow benches won't pull that depression, so lower depressions are used then scaled to 28" for comparison . Temperature is used to create a correction factor, and there maybe other things that I am forgetting that contribute to that correction . So the best you can do with your sheet is to multiply each test point by the percentage and create a graph of Lift vs. Flow , for the Intake and Exhaust . So as an Example for the Intake , you would multiply 400 x 70% = 280 cfm .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greentown, IN
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
To make anything out of this flow sheet you also need
1. Bore size of the cylinder head fixture 2. Was there a radius intake flow entry 3. Was there a exhaust pipe on exhaust and was head turned around 4. What was actual flow for the 400 scale 5. Was air speed checked Just some of the items you need |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Somwhere in NJ
Posts: 72
Likes: 4
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Have some one reflow test the head with modern data aqusition like Superflows FlowCom.Bill C.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks guys for the replies. Glad to see folks out there can make heads & tails outta this flow chart!
Given the issue of missing information, I think for true accuracy's sake I'll have these heads flowed again.
__________________
Jesse Kauk 6986 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|