HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2016, 10:44 AM   #1
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,457
Liked 4,379 Times in 502 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

I don't know how much about two-steps on a carb motor but an EFI motor must be tuned to do both. Footbraking launch RPM puts you in a lower load cell section on the fuel map and the transition to the high load launch must be smooth and have that accel enrichment stuff all tuned properly. The two step puts you in a high load cell as soon as you drop the pedal to the floor so all accel enrich stuff is finished before actual launch so you are transitioning between high load cells.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2016, 10:30 PM   #2
dean ribeiro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: candia, nh
Posts: 522
Likes: 59
Liked 239 Times in 79 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Rusty-
My experience has been .008-.012 quicker in 60ft ET with a two step switch (same launch RPM) This equates to .016-.024 improvement in 1/4 ETs. It should be noted that to leave matted off of a 2-Step, the carb requires a different set up (think secondaries). My experience with fuel injection stockers mirror Eric and Bobby ( you stand to pick up a little more ET). I suspect this has to do with the amazing starting line efficiencies with FI (compared to the "quadra-bogs")

Feel free to call with questions buddy!

PS- I surround myself with much smarter people than myself! 😁
dean ribeiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2016, 02:37 PM   #3
StockerStang912
Junior Member
 
StockerStang912's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
Liked 21 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

We experienced a marginal performance improvement of .01 to 02 with a 2-step on a low hp Fox Body stocker. Would have to make a few more runs to have a better idea with reaction time, but certainly made staging easier/consistent.

To Bobby's point, we did not adjust fuel enrichment to accommodate the change so not sure if it's a true apples-to-apples comparison.
__________________
Greg Viscome
193 GT/QA
StockerStang912 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 03:43 PM   #4
Jack McCarthy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 30
Liked 501 Times in 120 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

my car hates it (as do i) kills me about .05 at least - more in bad air ....
and i cannot stand that sound ...

so im stuck in the 60s footbraking it

captain
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK
"the Captain"
Jack McCarthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 07:35 AM   #5
Robert Simpson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Quote:
Originally Posted by dean ribeiro View Post
Rusty-
My experience has been .008-.012 quicker in 60ft ET with a two step switch (same launch RPM) This equates to .016-.024 improvement in 1/4 ETs. It should be noted that to leave matted off of a 2-Step, the carb requires a different set up (think secondaries). My experience with fuel injection stockers mirror Eric and Bobby ( you stand to pick up a little more ET). I suspect this has to do with the amazing starting line efficiencies with FI (compared to the "quadra-bogs")

Feel free to call with questions buddy!

PS- I surround myself with much smarter people than myself! 😁
Dean could you better explain to me about adjusting the secondary for a FB two step? I have a street car that I Foot brake. I leave around 1500 and it flashes to about 3800. I tried a two step one time and while it reacted quicker to stumbled about 10' foot out and then cleared up. You can IM me with any details if you would like. Thanks
Robert Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 09:10 AM   #6
Rusty Davenport
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville N.C.
Posts: 506
Likes: 4
Liked 101 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Maybe someone will see this and reply but has anyone experimented with low rpm 2 step ......will the motor respond ok on the 2 step at 2000 ????
__________________
NHRA AND IHRA STOCK ELIMINATOR 2772
Rusty Davenport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:59 PM   #7
Rsmith38
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Don't know about 2000 but my R/SA Jeep 4.0 leaves fine at 2550 - down from 3000 because the brakes won't keep it from pushing thru the lights!
4.0 is FI so can't say about a carb reacting.
Rsmith38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2016, 03:05 PM   #8
Rusty Davenport
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville N.C.
Posts: 506
Likes: 4
Liked 101 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

I'm finding out little by little with experimentation, and it gets back a little to what some of you hinted around to, the quadrajet does not like "rich" fuel mixture when leaving on the mat with the 2 step activated by the brake. It will sit on the starting line and hold the RPMS but when you let go the "rich" will usually make it leave terribly, even though it will run great with the same carb setup when running with the footbrake only.
MAKING THE 2 STEP WORK WITH THE QJET IS A CHALLENGE in order to get it to perform at its best especially on a stocker that doesn't have a transbrake and has to leave at much lower RPMS......by what I am seeing testing the 2 step requires leaner setup to run at least reasonably well.
Does anyone else have similar findings ????
__________________
NHRA AND IHRA STOCK ELIMINATOR 2772
Rusty Davenport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2016, 07:43 PM   #9
Danny Ashley
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marion,In.
Posts: 267
Likes: 60
Liked 110 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Plug the accelerator well tubes
Danny Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2016, 09:30 PM   #10
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Your experience foot brake vs. 2 step regarding ET

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty Davenport View Post
Maybe someone will see this and reply but has anyone experimented with low rpm 2 step ......will the motor respond ok on the 2 step at 2000 ????
I used to leave at 2200 with my 455 Lemans. I did what Danny said. blocked off the accelerator tubes and it left great. Always to the floor.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.