|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
Noooooooooooooooooooooooo
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 101
Liked 18 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Do you think the early Pontiac 3 barrel afb and manifold could get in, bet Norman would really like that!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,865 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting! Could this have something to do with the Tech Dept. suddenly approving an (bogus) Edelbrock intake (and maybe more to come?) for Stock Eliminator?
http://dragracingonline.com/agent132...-xix_2-19.html This isn't over by a long shot! Keep calling and e-mailing your DTD and California with your thoughts!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
LOCOMOTION Racing |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Wait Wait Wait Hold the presses...... I wonder since the availability of the LD340 is limited will NHRA Tech now allow a superseded manifold to replace the LD340 such as............ Air-Gap Torker/TorkerII or Victor The jury is still out..... Tech just gets defensive when questioning their reasoning.....
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 2,930
Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Are they that bored over there? I could give them plenty to do.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It's called justification...................
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,865 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
What has me concerned here is NHRA has already approved the LD4B for the 273. They pulled off a sneaky approval recently of the LD340. Using NHRA reasoning(not my reasoning), I don't see why the DP4B wouldn't be approved for the 383 and the CH4B for the 413 and 440. They are in the same parts book with the same "aftermarket" P in the part number.
Now, AFTER they have approved these intakes, why couldn't they approve a "replacement" intake just like the 396/375 deal? Knowing what I know about the AMC Edelbrock intake, I have to say that based on what NHRA is doing with the Mopar intakes, the AMC intake should be legal. And to go one step further, when will NHRA start approving Edelbrock intakes for all makes based strictly on legal precedence? We're fast on our way to being ET-2!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|