|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
I like it !!! Now I don't have to buy them $3600 headers anymore
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]()
Daran, be real...do you think that if they adopt the new AHFS that would stop a racer on spending money on their car? Even when the AHFS was implemented, it did not stop or lower the expenditures of racers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Be real... lower expenditure racers??? You can bet any rule reducing the value of performance is going to adversely effect the performance parts industry and the engine builders.
Most racers are racing cars that appeal to them and most of them can't run more than 1.15 under on a regular basis. Some racers are satisified with the performance of their cars, and some racers don't have or want to spend the dough it takes to make a combination lightening fast, and some racers don't want to do the hard work that it takes to go fast. OR maybe it's a combination of all these factors, but the bottom line is nhra is trying real hard to kill off the high performance aspect of the sport. Sure, regulate for fairness but then they should leave avenues open for the racers who want to go fast. Also, the guys who go for combinations that they know are not real class competitors from the beginning should not come out and complain about other combinations. You guys knew what you you were getting into when you chose your combination.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|