|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 1,085
Liked 8,052 Times in 1,529 Posts
|
![]()
A little interesting tidbit is that 1983 Camaro coupe is still factored at 263 HP.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,912
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
I thought I might make a couple of points here.
This is not meant to knock anybody .(Okay, maybe NHRA) .I've known Kenny for a long time . He helped me build a S/S Chevy II station wagon, over 40 years ago. He certainly has paid his dues, both literally and figuratively. * Jeff Stout told you what's supposed to happen if you show up with an F.I. air inlet duct in front of a 4 bbl. carb engine. That alone is a good reason to have knowledgeable tech guys look at every car, every race. * I always thought you supposed to take everything off of the front end of a drag car , that wasn't needed, no matter how small or light. ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 209
Liked 312 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]()
If Tech says you need the body pcs. to present your Camaro as a Z28, like hood, ground effects, spoiler, etc. and of course your min. weight is different than a plain Camaro then that air inlet should be on the car. You can't suck and blow at the same time. Hey that's 2/3's of a pun, pu
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
With, or without that plastic piece, but a carbureted version did not come with that. Could help direct air, but did not come on carbureted cars. I worked on those when they were new.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 06-14-2017 at 08:52 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bethany La.
Posts: 323
Likes: 96
Liked 169 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
An 85 Camaro in any body style shouldn't have been able to run "f".
__________________
Bill Bogues 4696 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 26
Likes: 6
Liked 32 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I agree. Am I missing something?
__________________
Tim Snively H/SA 4444 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 2,621
Liked 2,741 Times in 967 Posts
|
![]()
In a perfect NHRA tech environment, there would be proper technical inspections performed by dedicated and knowledgeable personnel with the resources necessary to enforce the rule book, and back in Glendora and the Divisional offices there would be a knowledgeable staff to closely monitor performance, factoring and technical standards.
At one time all this existed, but it will never happen again, the NHRA won't fund it because it's no longer important to them. They've made a business decision. Just an observation, not a criticism. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Niagra Falls, New York
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bridgewater, NS, Canada
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Anyone have an idea what NHRA's thinking is on this one? Looks like the same engine, but I have to be missing something obvious. They changed it back a day later for some reason.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 1,085
Liked 8,052 Times in 1,529 Posts
|
![]()
Because a 1983 Camaro has a different front fascia than the 85/86 Camaro. It is a different car. It's a different engine as it uses a 432 intake manifold...in addition to being allowed the 055 and 053.
Last edited by MR DERBY CITY; 06-14-2017 at 10:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|