|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, with you running in the same class as the 340 combo, I understand your concern over any perceived advantage it, or any other E/SA combo may have over yours. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
I thought that with the new and improved NHRA Tech Management that the "revision" to allow the use of a non-assembly line, after market, Direct Connection performance aluminum manifold would include a 10 HP reduction in rating due to having to add additional ballast?????????????
I don't get it, but maybe that's OK, too.............. Very soon with aftermarket aluminum performance intake manifolds, roller rocker arms, solid hydraulic lifters (flat & roller), aftermarket disk brakes, aluminum radiators & seats, unlimited spring design and pressure and now all that the NHRA needs to do is to eliminate the stock valve lift spec and we are what's known as Super Stock..... Very nice work NHRA it looks like you will be able to get more time to run the Pros, plus it leaves time for the spectators to view exhibitions like the Big Tire / Small Tire fiasco and jet dragsters... Another job well done by NHRA Tech Management.....
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|