|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Excellent post Ken. I am glad to see that NHRA admits reading Class Racer Forum and takes some of what is written on this forum under consideration. We will never know if the thread dealing with the possibility of no teardown at Indy had any bearing on NHRA's decision to go ahead and have it after all. The main thing is NHRA did have a teardown and it seemed to go well for everyone. Racers and forum viewers came away with a feeling that NHRA is still concerned about the legality of the cars in Stock and S/S. Thank you NHRA for listening when it comes to Sportsman racers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Liked 276 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]()
Ditto Ken on the well done post.
I'll second what Ken said about the NHRA readership of Class Racer. I had several meetings at Indy with NHRA management and Class Racer was mentioned by several of the key NHRA management members. One more comment - I came away from the meetings with a high level of optimism for NHRA Sportsman racing. They are listening and actively working on ways to make our racing experience better. This may include changes to the ways things have always been done - but they are being done with a long term win-win objective in mind. The Indy racer parking was a great example that we all need to learn from. It will never be the same as it was. The key is to keep the racing going and growing in the face of lots of external challenges that we all face every day in the real world.
__________________
Been racing Stock and S/S cars since 1973. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|