|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,820
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,129 Times in 1,956 Posts
|
![]()
I would say that Professor Vic is on the money here. I never had good luck trying to save run data from track to track, especially around here , or with using some kind of sliding scale. I just correct from the last previous run , if it did everything right.
For instance, going off Friday am , Saturday, 1st round showed a 14.617 corrected slightly. Car ran a .615. Unfortunately , we were dialed a .62.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 66
Liked 706 Times in 283 Posts
|
![]()
The BG calculator already corrects uses dyno correction.. Sometimes I will use it and also what the previous run and weather to predict. My carb tune previous was not spot on because of ET change at only 133 ft. Now its averaging 165 per ft for .01 ET change. So I'm gaining on tune being very consistent. Which is helping from daytime time runs and night time eliminations. Thanks for the input
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|