|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 4,262
Liked 776 Times in 199 Posts
|
![]()
Terrible call, very sad, going in the wrong direction!!!
Bret Velde 2003 SS/LA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,667
Liked 2,639 Times in 441 Posts
|
![]()
I agree 100%.
__________________
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, CT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 1,146
Liked 905 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
Terrible decision. The NHRA will legislate Pro Stock into oblivion.
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Whitecourt,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 236
Likes: 4,707
Liked 91 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
This has become NHRAs new crate motor class
__________________
Bruce Cameron 68 Nova 396 E/S 68 Camaro SS/? ex Checkmate Modified |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Elkin, NC
Posts: 671
Likes: 169
Liked 44 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bob, I'm afraid they already have....
__________________
Mack Reeves 2377 STOCK & SUPER STOCK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 706
Likes: 77
Liked 100 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
While the NHRA decision to allow any car/engine combo to race has brought out a lot of opinions about it........
None of our opinions matter. It's only the opinions of the paying spectators that matter. The bottom line is and will always be about the dollars. The opinions from sportsman racer matter very little. It's been a very very very long time since I have sat in the seats to watch any pro class make a pass. Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Saint John NB Canada
Posts: 561
Likes: 30
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
This could be the stupidest thing NHRA has done ever. They should change the name of the class as there is absolutely nothing "stock" about it anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,308
Likes: 2,422
Liked 3,227 Times in 981 Posts
|
![]()
Perhaps an attempt at twisted humor but see that Competition Plus started a poll asking their readers which body would they like to see approved for the "new body" in PS. See below:
Choices DODGE CHALLENGER CADILLAC CTS FORD MUSTANG TOYOTA CELICA CHEVROLET CORVETTE DODGE CHARGER FORD FUSION Like which manufacturer would make the investment to get any of those approved (excluding the already approved Mustang of course) just to see another GM motor leased from KB, Gray or Elite slid between the frame rails? Geez...but think I'll vote for the Toyota in keeping with NHRA's ongoing mockery of Pro Stock. Slide a PS class into Comp (ala PST) and promote Comp and give them decent $$$ and be done with it. Pro Mod will keep throwing the dirt in on the grave of PS. Having seen the early PS cars of Grumpy, Sox&Martin,Booth, Gapp&Roush, etc. in action this is sad indeed. Change is inevitable but this will likely be the end of PS.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table Last edited by jmcarter; 12-13-2017 at 11:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: My RV
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Last few years it's been a Camaro class. With this change the teams will go with the most aerodynamic body and all cars will be that body. If they wanted more than one body style in competition this is not the answer.
Jeff ![]()
__________________
Street legal 64 Falcon Sprint with 410W ![]() Stock - Super Stock fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Has anyone caught the Warren Johnson interview on the NHRA website in regard to the new rules for Pro Stock? Maybe I'm not reading him right, but is he looking for some bucks to get back in the game and develop a Hemi?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|