|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 1,624
Liked 1,955 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
No, actually you don't have a perfectly legal crate motor. You know why? Because crate motors are not accepted in NHRA Stock Eliminator, and IHRA Stock Eliminator is dead. What you have is a candidate for a bracket car or a street car. Further, it didn't come stock in anything, so it isn't more stock than any legal original combination, regardless of accepted aftermarket components. Mostly what you have is a car, an illegal engine, and an entitled attitude that makes you think the current rules should be altered to fit your wants and needs, not to mention a holier than thou attitude about how stock your crate motor is. Oh, and the superiority complex that makes you think anyone is scared of you. You guys with crate motors are demanding that everyone else change their class with set rules to suit you, along with Mr. Pure Stock. And you've gotten worse with every post about how you think you're entitled to change someone else's game, and they're jerks for not jumping through hoops and bending over backwards to do as you ask. Here's the deal, the NHRA class has been around a long time, and has done better than the IHRA deal. So much better now that NHRA races usually fill their quotas, and your IHRA deal dropped stone dead. those are the absolute incontrovertible facts, regardless of how you, I, or anyone else feels about them. If the IHRA deal was so great, and you guys had such a good thing, it would still be going, and NHRA would be falling all over themselves to do it. I don't have anything personal against any of you. I really hate that you lost your place to race, I hate that for anyone, and I hate that it keeps IHRA from doing at least a little to help keep NHRA slightly honest. Currently, we're not racing, hopefully, in the not too distant future, we can return. In the mean time, I'm helping about a dozen other guys with their program, selling parts and technical support, at minimum. None of them is running anything other than a currently legal NHRA combination, and none of them wants to see any classes added. The way they see it, they're stepping up to spend the money to build a combination that fits the current rules, and if they can do it, so can you.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 708
Likes: 13
Liked 319 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, what I don't think they realize is If NHRA were to allow crate motors in a year there would be killer crate engines being built just like the current stock eliminator stuff. I know Tilburg,Gulius, Barton and numerous other bulders would have them stupid fast in no time.
__________________
Lee Valentine 1661 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 1,604
Liked 462 Times in 92 Posts
|
![]()
I think I saw a V-8 Vega in IHRA crate motor class. Makes sense? Not to me. I ran a real Vega with the 4 cycl. Build your class car to the only rules that are there, NHRA !!!!!
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA 2010-2012 National Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,201
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 910
Likes: 706
Liked 1,075 Times in 380 Posts
|
![]()
Really.? I don't recall any.... Who.? Gulius ,Barton or Tilburg are in a different zip code when it comes to speed (running under the indexes). Others too of course,... but their names were mentioned. If you turned them loose on the same engines, apples to apples, especially with the 3 tenths gift handicap that IHRA had, and no horsepower penalty system in place, it would have been entertaining at the least. Most NHRA cars that showed up at IHRA races left their cars in bracket mode and were top top qualifiers .. I don't mean to be disrespectful, and maybe I'm wrong and missing something here, , but there is ( I mean was) no comparison ..And it don't madder anyway
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS Last edited by Jeff Niceswanger; 02-18-2018 at 09:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 830
Likes: 1,635
Liked 359 Times in 135 Posts
|
![]()
Arrgh !
__________________
Who owns this car, with the peace sign,mag wheels, and four on the floor? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Until there is a heads up race. Even then racers move up and down a Class to avoid one. New aftermarket pieces for Stockers are just CM engines without saying it! No shame in it..IHRA CMs are natural documented replacements. What we have now anyway is Modified Stock and Super Stock. A real Stock Eliminator Class will have to be recreated! D Last edited by Dan Fahey; 02-18-2018 at 10:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,113 Times in 304 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 1,624
Liked 1,955 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
We have a 69 Camaro 427/425. We've run it since 2007, it's apart right now. Yes, it has GM replacement cylinder heads and intake. No, it is NOT a damned crate motor. You calling it one, with your ignorant opinion, doesn't make it one, either. It uses a a couple of GM replacement parts, but it is the original combination sold in 1969, a 427/425HP L-72. Your pompous arrogant opinion about the class and the cars is exactly why the vast majority of NHRA Stock Eliminator racers don't want a damned thing to do with you or your suggestions.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 504
Likes: 130
Liked 456 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Are the original L-72 closed chamber heads an open chamber 119cc replacement head cut down to 103.3 cc closed chamber specs? Just more proof of how F'd up stock and SS are at this point |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|