So how come no HP adjustment from gators ??

[Larry Hill]

98 down Lt1 , 99 up Ls1 in F bodys

[Bobby Lundholm]

Originally Posted by Larry Hill

98 down Lt1 , 99 up Ls1 in F bodys

98 is a split year in the Camaro's you can run either an LT1 or LS1

[Whalen3186]

Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm

98 is a split year in the Camaro's you can run either an LT1 or LS1

Larry is correct, 98 is LT1 and 99 is LS1 in the guide.

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by Whalen3186

Larry is correct, 98 is LT1 and 99 is LS1 in the guide.

In the real world, there were no LT1 new cars in 1998. Only LS1. For some reason, GM did not submit LS1 data to NHRA for certification in 1998. The story I was told, by an engineer at GM, the reason was the lack of LS1 racing parts & R&D at that time. And, the LT1 was still doing pretty well.

[Race Clean]

[/QUOTE] Posted by Duane Eiskant II
We’re getting the gift, (Billy forgot where the brake pedal was what sucks is that it was a losing effort to a car that I’m positive is illegal as hell. Thanks for no tech NHRA [/QUOTE]

So a paper car got hp,big deal.He can just keep on change a thing on it and use one of the other gazillion combos there is of it!
No such luck for the Street Hemi E-Body Cars,they need to start writing letters..

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

In the real world, there were no LT1 new cars in 1998. Only LS1. For some reason, GM did not submit LS1 data to NHRA for certification in 1998. The story I was told, by an engineer at GM, the reason was the lack of LS1 racing parts & R&D at that time. And, the LT1 was still doing pretty well.

Another of those paper cars, thats funny

[George Fitzpatrick]

who went 1.20 under with the 426 Hemi?

[jmcarter]

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick

who went 1.20 under with the 426 Hemi?

Woody Gary