|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And mine took out the engine too- it knocked the engine oil filter boss off the rear engine plate, as well as snapping off several of the bellhousing bolt mounting ears. I think I was able to salvage the little Holley 600 double-pumper carb, the aluminum Racing Beat intake manifold, the RX7 electronic distributor, the spark plug wires, and the underdrive front crank pulley, but that's about it. I didn't have a mid-mount, but my solid engine mounts at the front and the solid transmission mount at the rear, kept the engine and transmission from falling out of the car. The transverse set-up depicted above looks pretty dangerous. I'd definitely want a substantial steel shield for a car like that, possibly made of AR500 armor plate. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 884
Likes: 1,564
Liked 381 Times in 148 Posts
|
![]()
Instead of a weight box you have 300# of armour plating hanging off the firewall LOL!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 610
Likes: 242
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
|
![]()
Looks like somebody has jumped in with one of these, but can't get close to the index yet:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Wonder if anyone has any pics of the car ? That qualifying list is book ended by 2 turbo 2.3L Fords. Old style turbo 2.3L and the newest style turbo 2.3L Congrats to Sean Marconette on the # 1 position
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 05-06-2018 at 01:09 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 568
Likes: 306
Liked 280 Times in 86 Posts
|
![]()
Awesome…Finally a cure for INSOMNIA . MB
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, go to Midwest Class racer on face book, there are people posting on Topeka & Marion’s races. Mite be racer runing street car to get grade?
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Back in the older days a racer could potentially take a new street car and enter Stock legally without having to add a roll bar, or aftermarket seat belts because the car fell into the slower classes. Can't do that now.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 05-06-2018 at 09:45 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 977
Likes: 792
Liked 275 Times in 76 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Lots of hours over the winter working on the car. We figured something out with our race with Darrel Goheen yesterday and built upon that today. I did not get a chance to seek out the owner of the Focus. It looked to be right off the street. The track staff thought it was in the wrong group of cars on Saturdays race. Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 610
Likes: 242
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
|
![]()
I thought I'd revive this thread since the car in question competed at last weekend's Topeka divisional:
83 5801 FS/G Jonathon Maestas, Abeline KS, '17 Focus 13.424 11.35 2.074 There are 2 big problems with this...first off, this is not a Factory Stock car and was obviously misclassified. Second, he dialed .55 over the index in first round on Friday: Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 5305 Jim Parsons 5801 Jonathon Maestas E1 ****WINNER**** 0.162 11.305 97.44 0.079 13.287 104.48 F/S Dial: 11.08 (+/-): 0.225 FS/G Dial: 11.90 (+/-): 1.387 Qualified: #41 11.097 -0.703 #83 13.424 2.074 The weight break for this car is 10.91, making it a natural F/S. In my thinking, this round should've been a heads-up! From what I've heard, the owner is young and eager to learn but doesn't really have a clue about the classification system. It was left to the NHRA staff, who I believe were working with little to no data. We don't want this young man to get discouraged and give up, but you can't just throw the rules out the window for one guy. If I were Mr. Parsons and this round would've gone the other way, you can bet I would have had words with the tech officials. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 977
Likes: 792
Liked 275 Times in 76 Posts
|
![]()
He was pitted over by me and was not around when I went to talk to him. A couple of things that was noticed at the National Open. No permanent numbers or class designation, and what appears to be non factory tinted windows that are quite dark.
At last weeks race the numbers appeared to be permanent but the class designation was shoe polish? I was told there were issues with fuel check too. To Paul's point no one wants to discourage a new racer. But help yourself out and ask fellow racers for some help. I have a pretty good idea who teched his car, they have no idea about class cars and our rules. Per Classracer Info, it should be in AAF/S. Min w/driver is 3448 lbs and is rated at 298 HP. Index is 13.50 I highly recommend the racer of this car reach out to your fellow division racers for some help everyone is here to lend a hand. Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N Last edited by Sean Marconette; 08-03-2018 at 01:33 PM. Reason: More info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|