HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2018, 05:17 PM   #1
JHeath
Senior Member
 
JHeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 786
Likes: 2,876
Liked 370 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Chuck Watson was the quickest FSS car with an 8.075 in Norwalk, lost on a holeshot in Rd 2. Dodge has really stepped up, and Ford needs to do the same !
__________________
Jerry Heath
I/S '93 Cobra
FS/J 2010 Mustang "Ebay CJ"
JHeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 05:33 PM   #2
troublemaker427
Member
 
troublemaker427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hampstead, MD.
Posts: 422
Likes: 282
Liked 64 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHeath View Post
Chuck Watson was the quickest FSS car with an 8.075 in Norwalk, lost on a holeshot in Rd 2. Dodge has really stepped up, and Ford needs to do the same !
Yup. the factory needs to step up!! Ford started this, don't leave your racers hang out to dry!!!!

I'm also waiting for Ford Performance to release the Power Pack for my 2018 Mustang GT!!!!!
__________________
Jody Aberts
Troublemaker2
1966 Fairlane 427
troublemaker427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 07:57 PM   #3
FS Fan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHeath View Post
Chuck Watson was the quickest FSS car with an 8.075 in Norwalk, lost on a holeshot in Rd 2. Dodge has really stepped up, and Ford needs to do the same !
That puts him a tenth and a half quicker than the next Ford (Tasca) which makes me wonder if there was a timing issue or something.

BTW- taking nothing away from the Watson team. They have consistently been the strongest Ford this season and they are the closest thing to a factory team. But that level of performance increase is odd. He was the slowest ET winner of round 1, and then is the fastest of the weekend in round 2.
FS Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:02 PM   #4
Lenny5160
Senior Member
 
Lenny5160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by FS Fan View Post
That puts him a tenth and a half quicker than the next Ford (Tasca) which makes me wonder if there was a timing issue or something.

BTW- taking nothing away from the Watson team. They have consistently been the strongest Ford this season and they are the closest thing to a factory team. But that level of performance increase is odd. He was the slowest ET winner of round 1, and then is the fastest of the weekend in round 2.
He had a strong Q2 run with the 2nd highest MPH at the 1/8 mile, so the performance is there.

The 60' was a tenth better in R2 than it was in R1, so I'm guessing the increase in 'performance' was more related to traction.
__________________
S/ST 51
S/C 53
Lenny5160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:18 PM   #5
JHeath
Senior Member
 
JHeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 786
Likes: 2,876
Liked 370 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Chris Holbrook has his new John Holt built CJ @ the paint shop.
__________________
Jerry Heath
I/S '93 Cobra
FS/J 2010 Mustang "Ebay CJ"
JHeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 02:51 PM   #6
Superfan1
VIP Member
 
Superfan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,667
Liked 2,642 Times in 441 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHeath View Post
Chris Holbrook has his new John Holt built CJ @ the paint shop.
That's what I've been waiting to hear! Anyone know anything about the CJ that Bo Butner is supposed to be getting?
__________________
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1
Bridgeport, CT
Superfan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 07:15 AM   #7
FS Fan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenny5160 View Post
The 60' was a tenth better in R2 than it was in R1, so I'm guessing the increase in 'performance' was more related to traction.
You could be on to something. I've been told that the Ford 4-link in the 2016 is tricky compared to their older 3-link suspension that was supposedly more forgiving. I know there's more to getting down than the rear suspension but it sure seems to help.
FS Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 07:27 AM   #8
FS Fan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Adding to my earlier questions...

some racers think NHRA will clamp down on the Showdown class and say "no more engine combos"

Wouldn't that make it more important to get a new 18 combo and the 5.4Lw/4.0L class legal ASAP just in case they close the book?
FS Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 08:32 AM   #9
Jim D'Amore
Sponsor
 
Jim D'Amore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Adding to my earlier questions...

some racers think NHRA will clamp down on the Showdown class and say "no more engine combos"

Wouldn't that make it more important to get a new 18 combo and the 5.4Lw/4.0L class legal ASAP just in case they close the book?






From what I hear they are going to put a freeze on engine combinations for 2019 for the Showdown class but Mike has been telling the higher ups in Ford and myself that the engine combination freeze is on now. The higher ups in Ford realize after their meeting with NHRA in Norwalk that the engine freeze will not take place till 2019.


You were right on the 2018 engine combinations. Should have been put on the books months ago. We are 60 cubic inches down from GM and Mopar. That's like running on 7 cylinders.
__________________
Jim D'Amore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 12:55 PM   #10
Dyno
Senior Member
 
Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 920
Likes: 1,152
Liked 695 Times in 206 Posts
Default Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim D'Amore View Post
Adding to my earlier questions...

You were right on the 2018 engine combinations. Should have been put on the books months ago. We are 60 cubic inches down from GM and Mopar. That's like running on 7 cylinders.

Ford may be down 60 cubic inches: but up 16 valves, up 3 camshafts and down 16 pushrods. Based on MPH, I think all 3 brands are pretty equal, traction and 60 foot times seem to be the issue.
Dyno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.