|
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 09:20 AM
|
#1 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 891
Liked 882 Times in 236 Posts
|
Re: Anti-Roll bar in Stock
Billy is correct .
Although some have argued that the anti-roll bar is not a traction device , NHRA correctly sees it as such.
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK |
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 09:34 AM
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,742 Times in 1,740 Posts
|
Re: Anti-Roll bar in Stock
Just another interesting (and ignored) Rule Book note,under Traction Bars, sentence4, "device must be installed under leaf spring" which would mean that cal-tracs would not be legal as a portion of the "device" is installed above the leaf spring. Go figure.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 11:48 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 615
Likes: 16
Liked 920 Times in 259 Posts
|
Re: Anti-Roll bar in Stock
I prefer for it to be bolt in/removable in some fashion since it is a wear item that is subject to occasional cleaning/lube/maintenance. Easier to get the assembly out of the car to work on it.
|
|
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 12:59 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
Re: Anti-Roll bar in Stock
Quote:
I'm going to guess this slides by because it mounts in the original hole the leaf spring mounted in so it's not technically mounting "above" even though the Cal-tracs does lower the mounting hole of the spring itself once installed so it is physically above once installed. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
