|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Colorado hills
Posts: 123
Likes: 11
Liked 73 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
If more folks studied rotational INERTIA more than reading the hype of suppliers of lightweight parts, they would save lots more money. IF one spent more time on reducing the rotational inertia of the flywheel /clutch/converter AND the wheels/tires then there would be a more effective approach. Looking under the streetlight for low hanging performance fruit is cheaper and involves more common sense.Out in the shadows gets more expensive and much more questionable in results.
![]() Regards to All that like this kind of stuff, ![]() HB2 ![]() Dissident |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, nothing in the trans, or rear end, is large enough diameter to have a measurable effect on inertia to show up on your time slip. Hard to imagine how low the hp would be required to see anything on the time slip. Wish I had the time & money back I wasted on parts & track rentals testing, because “there HAS to be something there!”
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|