|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]()
Barry, HP increases must be given on a percentage basis. You can't (well, you can, NHRA did for years) just give HP 3 or 5 or 10 at a time. As an example, a 3 HP hit to an A car (8.00 lbs.) is a 24 lb. weight penalty. The same 3 HP hit to a U car (20 lbs.) is 60 lbs.! Now look at your 10 HP hit, 80 vs. 200 lbs.!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
Billy you are correct. My point was to make the system simple and so less games have to be played all year to avoid a hp hit. If you do go fast but not too fast you get a minor amount of hp not enough to ruin your combo. Something that would only make you have to carry about 20 pds. If you go real fast you get a hp hit to put you inline with what the hp should be for that combo.
The KISS rule should be in effort for the AHFS BP Last edited by B Parker; 01-13-2020 at 11:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
I'm sure I'll get attacked for this one. But how many comb's in 600ft of air or less in a heads up run on kill do you think can go somewhere around 1:20 under. Maybe not your car but someone else that is running your combo. Here is something I don't want to see happen. Lets take the 1969 350/255 hp combo. There are a lot of them out there. And that combo has been beat on as much as any. Now Indy has shown the 350 combo is not the fastest in the class the last several years. So you get two H/SA cars one being the 350 and the other a Chrysler heads up in a later round at a race. Both are on kill and the air is good say 600ft. The 350 wins and only by .03 and goes 1.22under. The 350 is already not the fastest in the class so how much more weight and further behind do we want to put them. BP
Last edited by B Parker; 01-13-2020 at 11:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 3,359
Liked 1,804 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
How about run class at divisionals
. More cars involved . More chances for fast runs . Think about it. With 60 cars at National events nobody gonna get HP Usually the #1 qualifier will go 1 second under. And mineshaft happens Also Indy needs to count. It’s the only race that people will go stupid fast. This is a way to make the system work. The sandbagging at a class race will not work.
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 2,550
Liked 2,692 Times in 951 Posts
|
![]()
You have a no expense spared, state of the art, cutting edge, amazingly beautiful Stock Eliminator car that you have worked very, very hard to refine it's carefully chosen combination to run like a bat out of hell, only to very carefully protect it's factor by not running too fast or fast too often, even if means racing to 1000 feet during a heads up run against a formidable foe.
What am I missing here? |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 637
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
![]()
Frank, I think it is hey went 10.05 at 105 MPH, no HP but you still know that car is stupid fast.
Randy Wells Wells Bros C/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 2,550
Liked 2,692 Times in 951 Posts
|
![]()
I wish I knew a solution to the AHFS, Index and factoring quagmire and hope someone much smarter than me does, so the issue will be resolved and we can enjoy performance based RACING not this sandbagging bull****.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 1,922
Liked 10,681 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
![]()
The 60th US Nationals was the last year all runs counted for the AHFS. Ask me how I know. I got 29 HP in a 22 lb class for going - 2.452 under index. The engine was rated at factory HP. It took two plus years of work to get that done. I'm not crying in my beer I knew the rules and took the hit with a smile on my face.
I don't know what the answer is but whatever the rules are I will try to adapt. I have a few Saturdays left so we have fun until we can't do it any more. Jimmy Malone said it best "This getting old stuff is not for the meek". Back to work! |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Could it be the stupid fast car owners do not want let other competitors in the class know how quick the car can go? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 358
Likes: 1,440
Liked 564 Times in 134 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
However something is very broken when the #1 qualifier at every event always seems to be about -0.98 under, and a -1.00 under run 10 years ago (before the index changes) means you're a sitting duck in a heads up race in a popular class. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|