|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 615
Liked 1,937 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
OK. I thought that was the reason for the "Mineshaft rule" to keep the combos from getting hit when the conditions were stupid fast like this past weekend. I didn't realize that if you still went 1.2 under you got hit with instant HP when the class met the mineshaft requirement . That probably needs to be changed.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 20
Liked 135 Times in 74 Posts
|
![]()
i am still amazed in this day and age the only thing nhra uses is ET to change indexes. they need to use horsepower correction factor along with the ET that was run.
With the weather reading/ tracking technology that has evolved since the 1970's i have to believe there is a realative easy way to establish a system to decide if it was just great conditions or a great run. as someone who raced on 0 elevation tracks (atco et al)and then going to indy, 1000ft +/- , can see there needs to be some way to level the numbers. and i know there will still be arguements, but with hand held weather station devices able to calculate correction factors on the spot, there has to be a way to make it work 99pct of the time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 3,388
Liked 1,828 Times in 427 Posts
|
![]()
The only problem I see is the car was on kill. And it shows
Now a little self control would have helped. I will never understand why someone would try to go that fast you got a put a limit on yourself
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,643
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,727 Times in 2,233 Posts
|
![]()
Sorensen got a free pass at the scales for being light at a D6 race. I forgot how it went, but heard the car ran fast enough to suck all the water out of the radiator.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
|
![]()
Larry that's not the one I was thinking about there was someone who went fast out there last year but lost some weight in the bushes at end of the track or something.
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA. SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
|
![]()
I always remember the Chevy 400 combination. Started at 280 horsepower, back when Mike and Ezra first ran one. By the time I gave up on it (in a Camaro, not that the body mattered), they were at 326. At 280, you could go a second under with plug wires off. At 326, you couldn't go a second under, falling to the ground from a skyscraper.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Stop global whining |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|