HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2020, 09:36 AM   #1
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 615
Liked 1,937 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

Quote:
Originally Posted by HR9121 View Post
Mineshaft yes but 1.20 under is still an instant hit ofcourse. From what I was told the weather was it was incredibly fast and all I can say is under those circumstances he may have not known how fast he was going.
OK. I thought that was the reason for the "Mineshaft rule" to keep the combos from getting hit when the conditions were stupid fast like this past weekend. I didn't realize that if you still went 1.2 under you got hit with instant HP when the class met the mineshaft requirement . That probably needs to be changed.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 10:43 AM   #2
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Pearson View Post
OK. I thought that was the reason for the "Mineshaft rule" to keep the combos from getting hit when the conditions were stupid fast like this past weekend. I didn't realize that if you still went 1.2 under you got hit with instant HP when the class met the mineshaft requirement . That probably needs to be changed.
The ahfs is a flawed system as it is. There is no need to weaken it any further. But racers do need to use some common sense when in mineshaft conditions.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 11:42 AM   #3
rognelson777
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 20
Liked 135 Times in 74 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

i am still amazed in this day and age the only thing nhra uses is ET to change indexes. they need to use horsepower correction factor along with the ET that was run.
With the weather reading/ tracking technology that has evolved since the 1970's i have to believe there is a realative easy way to establish a system to decide if it was just great conditions or a great run.
as someone who raced on 0 elevation tracks (atco et al)and then going to indy, 1000ft +/- , can see there needs to be some way to level the numbers.
and i know there will still be arguements, but with hand held weather station devices able to calculate correction factors on the spot, there has to be a way to make it work 99pct of the time.
rognelson777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 11:57 AM   #4
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 3,388
Liked 1,828 Times in 427 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

The only problem I see is the car was on kill. And it shows
Now a little self control would have helped.
I will never understand why someone would try to go that fast you got a put a limit on yourself
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 03:18 PM   #5
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,643
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,727 Times in 2,233 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

Sorensen got a free pass at the scales for being light at a D6 race. I forgot how it went, but heard the car ran fast enough to suck all the water out of the radiator.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 03:35 PM   #6
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

Larry that's not the one I was thinking about there was someone who went fast out there last year but lost some weight in the bushes at end of the track or something.
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA. SS/JA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 04:40 PM   #7
nhramnl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

I always remember the Chevy 400 combination. Started at 280 horsepower, back when Mike and Ezra first ran one. By the time I gave up on it (in a Camaro, not that the body mattered), they were at 326. At 280, you could go a second under with plug wires off. At 326, you couldn't go a second under, falling to the ground from a skyscraper.
nhramnl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 06:15 PM   #8
Race Clean
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: 1.20 under at Belle Rose

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Perrone View Post
I will never understand why someone would try to go that fast you got a put a limit on yourself
Exactly,why try to go fast in Dragracing
__________________
Stop global whining
Race Clean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.