|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 354
Liked 307 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
with 575 lift you get to use 500 2X...basically take advantage of the peak by keeping valve open .500 a little longer
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
Ok lets map the head flow onto the cam lift curve.Flow @ .500" 200, @ .550" 200.5 @ .600 210
The cam is a Lunati that has .507" lift with 1.5:1 rocker arms (green line) and .541 lift with 1.6:1 rocker arms {blue line) and .575" lift with 1.7: rocker arms (magenta line) Stan PS - Let me add a little more explanation. I have the ICL set at 110. If the engine is a 350 ci sbc (4 x 3.48 x 5.7) the peak piston velocity will be @ 74.3 ATDC which is also point of peak piston flow demand. Now as RPM goes up there will be a small delay seen at the intake. But you can see how as lift has increased the flow at peak demand has also. Last edited by Stan Weiss; 06-25-2020 at 05:36 PM. Reason: Added PS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|