|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Liked 735 Times in 386 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Looking at % Humidity at different temperatures will get you in to trouble. It is called Relative Humidity for a reason. You want to look at vapor pressure or gains of water. 103 - 40% - 0.843184 vp - 126.26 gow 89 - 70% - 0.962109 vp - 144.66 gow Stan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If I know absolutely nothing about the weather other than grains/dew point, I can predict my Nova within .05. If you have all of your runs in a spreadsheet along with several weather measurements (I use an export from Crew Chief Pro) it is pretty easy to run a correlation analysis that will tell you which weather elements most closely follow your changes in ET. For my alcohol carbureted door car, Grains/Vapor Pressure/Dew Point are #1. HP Correction Factor is #2, just slightly better than Density Altitude. To answer your original question, no it is not unusual at all for a 200 foot change in DA to impact the ET .02. I also agree with others that not all 200 foot changes in DA are created equally. That's the great challenge in ET prediction; there are all kinds of variables and they are constantly changing.
__________________
S/ST 51 S/C 53 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|