|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 706
Liked 1,514 Times in 563 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 1,869
Liked 10,582 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
![]()
Throwing stones............?
I think it could be Kevlar |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 157
Likes: 41
Liked 164 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
The hp rating is supposed to be for eng. and platform. My car is a 1981 camaro with a 305 rated at 237 hp. In a nova it's 230. also different in a impala . My hp was hit several years ago by a 1984 firebird witch is a totally different car,but the novas did not .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 63
Liked 701 Times in 279 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 635
Likes: 27
Liked 254 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
According to an email I received from Pat C, according to the the new wording 'Once an engine family receives a horsepower increase it is not eligible for a decrease' they mean if the NHRA HP is greater than the factory HP it will no longer be considered for a HP reduction. That about eliminates any HP reductions IMHO. Thought I saved the email, but I can't find it.
__________________
Mike Moller NHRA 203 Q-R-T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 2,047
Liked 2,167 Times in 504 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 172
Likes: 671
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Now if they would just reduce the 307 in in the 1989 Pontiac wagon........ Power Factors: Stock Auto Base Factors 207 Exception: Pontiac 213 Just damn. Rick Thomason GTO Mayhem Last edited by GTOMayhem; 12-13-2020 at 02:17 PM. Reason: formatting |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 2,734
Liked 2,398 Times in 679 Posts
|
![]()
Different Platform should be eligible for a reduction
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 1,869
Liked 10,582 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
![]()
I would like to see the AHFS have all runs count at all events that count towards division and national championships. Runs that won’t count, national opens, 1/8 mile runs, All Stars’, and test and tune.
If the AHFS can review and adjust power up twice a year, HP reduction should receive the same treatment. I thought the purpose of the AHFS was to adjust out of line HP above or below the line. The accounting task will be simplified if each review starts with a clean slate. The rule of can not have a reduction if power was added in the last two review periods causes hours of extra research and clerical errors. In my opinion what us racers don’t need is requesting HP reductions if the combination does not satisfy all the requirements for reduction. Please read and understand the rules. Do your part to help. How does NHRA deal with the automatic HP addition of the aluminum heads a few years ago? How do they deal with the switch from factory HP to SAE HP. And to me the biggest and most unfair system that adjusted HP, and lot of those are still on the books, was the committee that Bill, aka “Rosey”, Holt was on. I have received 29 HP for my run at Indy in a 22 lbs. class and taken a so so car and got it competitive. Not the fastest but competitive. Every .01 second comes at a price, but for me and others it’s worth it. Ain’t nothing like seeing the Gold Digger, Mr 413, or other great cars in the other lane racing heads up knowing your not the fastest but they can’t be late Last edited by Larry Hill; 12-14-2020 at 02:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 1,869
Liked 10,582 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA needs to publish the cut off date for accepting request for HP reduction. How about 10/31/ 20XX as a cutoff date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|